Virginia Senate Bill SB942

Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/6/23
• Refer: 1/6/23
• Report Pass: 1/11/23
• Engrossed: 1/16/23
• Refer: 2/8/23
• Report Pass: 2/9/23
• Enrolled: 2/16/23
• Chaptered: 3/22/23
• Passed: 3/22/23

Caption

Alexandria Historical Restoration and Preservation Commission; surety bonds for membership.

Impact

The passage of SB942 will impact local legislative frameworks concerning the formation and operational standards of the Alexandria Historical Restoration and Preservation Commission. By increasing the number of commission members from five to nine and setting clear guidelines on appointments and reimbursement for services, the bill aims to foster a more robust governance structure. Moreover, the introduction of surety bonds for members is intended to safeguard the interests of the commission and the public, enhancing trust in the management of preservation projects.

Summary

SB942 aims to modify the Alexandria Historical Restoration and Preservation Commission's structure by expanding its membership and implementing surety bond requirements for its members. The bill specifies that the Commission will consist of five members appointed by the city council and the governor, with terms averaging between two to four years depending on the appointee. The purpose of these changes is to enhance the Commission's capacity to oversee historical preservation efforts and ensure accountability through the surety bonds mandated for members.

Sentiment

Overall, discussions around SB942 have been positively inclined, with many stakeholders recognizing the necessity for a stronger governance structure for the preservation of Alexandria's historical assets. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the effectiveness of such changes and whether they will truly enhance preservation efforts in practice. The majority sentiment seems to favor the proposed amendments as a step towards better accountability and oversight.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns regarding the financial implications of requiring surety bonds, which may discourage qualified candidates from serving on the Commission due to the associated costs. Additionally, some members of the community have questioned whether expanding the Commission's size will translate into more effective preservation efforts or if it could lead to bureaucratic inefficiencies. Careful deliberation about the balance between maintaining a viable commission and ensuring accountability will likely continue as stakeholders engage with the bill's provisions.