Motor vehicles, certain; use of handheld personal communication devices.
If enacted, the bill would impose penalties for violations specific to using handheld devices while driving. Firstly, a first offense would attract a fine of $125, while subsequent offenses would double the fine to $250. Additionally, higher penalties are set for violating this law within a highway work zone, reflecting the heightened need for caution in these areas. This legislative action aims to balance the enforcement of road safety with the necessity to accommodate certain exceptions for emergency and professional use, thereby clarifying the law's application.
SB995 proposes amendments to the Code of Virginia regarding the use of handheld personal communications devices while operating motor vehicles on public highways. The primary objective of the bill is to enhance traffic safety by making it unlawful for drivers to hold handheld devices while driving. This move is aimed at reducing the incidents of distracted driving, which has become a significant concern across the Commonwealth, in line with national trends highlighting the dangers of using such devices behind the wheel.
The sentiment around SB995 appears to be largely supportive, especially among advocates for road safety and law enforcement. Proponents believe this law will be a crucial step towards decreasing road accidents attributable to distracted driving. However, some concerns were raised regarding the potential overreach of the law, particularly about its enforcement and implications for individuals who must operate devices for legitimate reasons, such as emergencies or specific professional duties.
Notable points of contention include balancing road safety with the practicality for emergency responders and others who may need to use handheld devices while on duty. Although certain exemptions are outlined for emergency vehicles and specific situations, discussions during legislative sessions have highlighted the challenge of ensuring compliance and effectively communicating the law's stipulations to the public. Critics argue that the complexity of local enforcement might lead to confusion among drivers, which could undermine the bill's safety goals.