Virginia House Bill HB337

Virginia 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/5/24
• Refer: 1/5/24

Caption

Siting of data centers; impacts on resources and historically significant sites.

Impact

If enacted, HB337 will directly affect local government regulations concerning land use for data centers. By stipulating the conditions under which data centers can be approved, the bill reinforces the importance of maintaining Virginia's historical integrity and environmental resources. This could lead to a more stringent review process for data centers, compelling local governments to consider cultural and environmental factors more carefully when approving such applications. Additionally, it may influence future plans for technology expansion in Virginia, as developers may have to navigate these new siting restrictions.

Summary

House Bill 337 proposes amendments to the Code of Virginia regarding the siting of data centers. The bill focuses on ensuring that any local government land use applications for data centers are only approved in areas that minimize impacts on historic, agricultural, and cultural resources. The legislation specifically prohibits the siting of data centers within a half-mile of national parks, state parks, or any other sites deemed historically significant by the Department of Historic Resources. This measure aims to provide a balance between the growth of technology infrastructure and the preservation of Virginia's rich historical context.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB337 may arise from stakeholders in the technology sector who wish to expedite the establishment of data centers to support growing digital demands. Critics might argue that the bill's restrictions could hinder economic development and the competitive edge of Virginia in attracting technological investments. On the other hand, advocates argue that the protection of historic sites and natural resources is paramount, suggesting that the negative impacts of unchecked development must be mitigated. This clash between economic growth and preservation of cultural heritage is likely to spark debate among legislators and community members.