Virginia House Bill HB471

Virginia 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/24
• Refer: 1/8/24

Caption

Uniform Statewide Building Code; multifamily residential housing construction projects.

Impact

The bill's regulations are set to apply only to new multifamily residential housing construction projects that receive local approval after January 1, 2025. Developers will be compelled to comply with the new standards, leading to an increased availability of electric vehicle charging stations in residential areas. This movement could signal a shift toward greener building practices and a push for more sustainable urban development in Virginia. The Board of Housing and Community Development is tasked with promulgating the specific regulations mandated by the bill, ensuring they are in place by the aforementioned date.

Summary

House Bill 471 aims to establish electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure standards specifically for multifamily residential housing construction projects that contain more than 25 residential dwelling units. This bill amends the Code of Virginia by adding regulations which require developers to ensure that at least 25 percent of the available parking spaces are made 'charging ready' for electric vehicles. This involves the provision of appropriate electrical room or breaker boxes capable of supporting Level 2 chargers, as stipulated by the U.S. Department of Energy. The goal is to promote the adoption of electric vehicles through necessary infrastructure changes in new housing developments.

Contention

Discussion surrounding HB 471 is expected to revolve around the balance between enhancing EV infrastructure and the additional costs to developers. Supporters of the bill argue that the infrastructure standard is a crucial step toward facilitating the growth of electric vehicle use, which aligns with broader environmental goals and state initiatives aimed at reducing carbon emissions. Conversely, some stakeholders, including builders and real estate developers, may express concerns about the added financial burden these mandates could impose, particularly in the context of already challenging housing market dynamics. It remains to be seen how these factors will play out in legislative discussions and potential amendments to the bill.