Virginia Senate Bill SB692

Virginia 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/19/24
• Refer: 1/19/24
• Report Pass: 2/6/24
• Engrossed: 2/8/24
• Refer: 2/14/24
• Report Pass: 2/16/24
• Enrolled: 2/26/24
• Chaptered: 3/28/24
• Passed: 3/28/24

Caption

Campaign finance; independent expenditure reports, electronic filing required.

Impact

The implementation of SB692 is expected to significantly impact existing regulations on campaign finance in Virginia. By establishing a stringent electronic reporting system for independent expenditures, the bill seeks to reduce the lag in financial disclosures, allowing voters to have immediate access to information on campaign expenditures that could influence elections. This shift in reporting could deter potential misconduct and enhance accountability among candidates and committees, thus aiming to foster integrity in the political process.

Summary

SB692 aims to amend the Virginia Code to enhance transparency in campaign finance by requiring persons, candidate campaign committees, and political committees making independent expenditures to file disclosure reports electronically. This requirement is triggered when these expenditures aggregate to $1,000 or more for statewide elections or $200 for other elections. The bill mandates that reports are due promptly within 24 hours of the expenditure or publication of materials advocating for or against a candidate, thereby aiming to create a more scrutinized and transparent campaign finance environment.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB692 appears to be largely supportive among advocates of campaign finance reform who see the bill as a necessary step towards greater transparency and accountability in elections. Supporters believe that electronic filing will reduce barriers for reporting and improve access to political expenditure information for the public. However, there may be concerns among certain groups regarding the burden that additional reporting requirements may impose, especially for smaller campaigns and grassroots organizations that might struggle with the new administrative workload.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to SB692 may arise primarily from discussions on the feasibility of the electronic filing requirement. Opponents could argue that such obligations may disproportionately affect smaller organizations and candidates who may lack the resources to comply fully with the new regulations. Additionally, discussions may also reflect concerns about privacy and data security associated with the electronic filing of sensitive financial information. Consequently, there may be calls for additional support or resources to assist smaller political entities in meeting these new requirements.