Virginia Senate Bill SJR25

Virginia 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/10/24
• Refer: 1/10/24
• Report Pass: 2/9/24
• Engrossed: 2/12/24
• Refer: 2/15/24
• Report Pass: 2/23/24
• Refer: 2/23/24
• Report Pass: 2/28/24
• Enrolled: 3/4/24
• Passed: 3/4/24
• Enrolled: 3/5/24
• Passed: 3/5/24

Caption

Groundwater supply in the Commonwealth; Department of Environmental Quality to study.

Impact

If enacted, SJR25 could have notable implications for state laws related to water management and environmental regulations. The resolution directs a thorough analysis of current and future groundwater levels and quality, the effectiveness of existing water management regulations, and the potential impacts of increasing groundwater withdrawals. This information will inform any necessary amendments to the Ground Water Management Act, influencing how groundwater resources are regulated and managed in the future.

Summary

SJR25 is a resolution that calls for the Department of Environmental Quality to conduct a comprehensive study of groundwater supply in the Commonwealth, particularly in areas east of Interstate 95. The resolution acknowledges the critical importance of maintaining a safe and sustainable drinking water supply while assessing the effectiveness of the existing regulatory framework established by the Ground Water Management Act of 1992. The study aims to address the challenges posed by newer industrial activities, such as data centers, that could significantly impact groundwater resources.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SJR25 has been largely supportive among stakeholders concerned with environmental sustainability and public health. Many advocates see the study as a necessary step to understand the current state of groundwater resources and the potential risks associated with industrial development. However, there may be some underlying contention regarding the balance between economic growth and environmental protection, particularly with regard to the expansion of data centers and their water consumption.

Contention

Discussions surrounding SJR25 raise important points of contention, particularly about how to effectively manage groundwater resources in light of industrial pressures. Critics may express concerns about the adequacy of existing regulations if significant amendments are deemed necessary, potentially sparking debates about resource allocation and governmental oversight. The bill highlights the essential conflict between regulatory needs and the emerging demands placed on natural resources by modern industries.