Virginia House Bill HB2273

Virginia 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/7/25
• Refer: 1/7/25

Caption

Deer, elk, or bear; Director of DWR or his designee has exclusive authority to provide kill permits.

Impact

This legislation aims to balance wildlife conservation efforts with the rights of property owners to protect their investments from destructive wildlife. The bill restricts the killing of deer to designated conditions and may grant limited permits to ensure compliance with local ordinances. This creates a system that addresses public safety and agricultural damage while allowing the Director to regulate these instances on a case-by-case basis. It also potentially reduces the bureaucratic delays that landowners previously faced when seeking permissions to address wildlife-related damages.

Summary

House Bill 2273 seeks to amend current regulations regarding the killing of deer, elk, and bears that are causing damage to personal property or pose hazards to aircraft and motor vehicles in Virginia. The bill outlines the authority of the Director or their designee to issue permits that allow landowners or designated individuals to kill these animals under specific conditions, ensuring that such actions can be taken swiftly when wildlife poses significant threats. The inclusion of both lethal and non-lethal measures aims to provide flexibility in wildlife management and address agricultural concerns, particularly for commercial production.

Contention

Notably, there could be contention surrounding the director's authority regarding the issuance of permits and the limits set on killing wildlife in populated areas. There are concerns that local communities may be deprived of their say in wildlife management, given that the Director has broad powers to approve or deny permits without local input. Furthermore, the bill’s provisions to revoke permits based on an 'abuse of authorization' may lead to disputes regarding subjective interpretations of such abuses. The inclusion of penalties for violations hints at a more stringent regulatory approach, which might face pushback from proponents of less restrictive wildlife management policies.