Vermont House Bill JRH008

Vermont 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/4/24
• Engrossed: 1/11/24
• Passed: 1/11/24

Caption

Joint resolution providing for an election to fill a vacancy in the Office of Sergeant at Arms

Impact

The passage of JRH008 impacts state laws by providing a clear procedural framework for filling vacancies in elected legislative roles, especially when they arise mid-session. This is essential to maintain the operational integrity and functionality of the legislative body in Vermont. The resolution guides the process for selecting a successor in a timely and organized manner, thereby alleviating potential disruptions caused by a sudden vacancy in a crucial position like the Sergeant at Arms, who plays a key role in maintaining order in legislative sessions.

Summary

JRH008 is a joint resolution aimed at facilitating the election process for filling a vacancy in the Office of Sergeant at Arms, which is scheduled to occur due to the announced retirement of the current officer, Janet Miller, on March 1, 2024. The resolution stipulates that the General Assembly shall meet to conduct this election during its session, ensuring continuity in this important legislative role. The joint assembly is set for 10:30 AM on the specified date, with provisions for consecutive meetings if the election is not resolved on the first attempt.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding JRH008 seems supportive, as it addresses a necessary procedural concern for the Vermont General Assembly. There is likely broad agreement among legislators that filling such vacancies efficiently is critical to proper governance. The proactive nature of the resolution reflects a commitment to ensuring that the legislative process continues smoothly, which is generally well-received among members of the assembly.

Contention

While the resolution appears straightforward and procedural, potential points of contention could arise regarding the selection of the new Sergeant at Arms. Discussions in the assembly may reveal differing opinions on candidates or the process itself, but as of the resolution’s introduction, there are no significant overt controversies reported. The focus is primarily on procedural efficiency rather than political disagreement.