Washington House Bill HB2099

Washington 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/24
• Refer: 1/8/24
• Report Pass: 1/19/24
• Refer: 1/23/24
• Report Pass: 2/2/24
• Refer: 2/5/24
• Engrossed: 2/9/24
• Refer: 2/13/24
• Report DNP: 2/15/24
• Refer: 2/19/24
• Report Pass: 2/22/24
• Refer: 2/23/24
• Report Pass: 2/26/24
• Enrolled: 3/7/24
• Chaptered: 3/28/24
• Passed: 3/28/24

Caption

Concerning state identification cards for persons in state custody or care.

Impact

The passage of HB 2099 will likely streamline the process of obtaining identification for those in state custody, potentially alleviating challenges faced by individuals who often lack access to necessary identification documents. This legislative change could significantly impact administrative procedures within state agencies, ensuring that identification is readily available and that individuals in state care can participate fully in societal functions. Moreover, it aligns with broader state efforts to improve services for at-risk populations.

Summary

House Bill 2099 addresses the provision of state identification cards for individuals in state custody or care, such as minors in foster care or individuals in correctional facilities. The bill is designed to enhance accessibility for these individuals by ensuring that they can obtain proper identification that may be necessary for various life functions, including healthcare and education. The introduction of this bill highlights the importance of providing essential services to vulnerable populations within the state's care.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2099 appears to be largely supportive among lawmakers, with a significant majority voting in favor of the bill. This support is reflective of a growing recognition of the need to address systemic barriers faced by individuals in state custody. Advocates have praised the bill as a positive step toward ensuring equitable treatment for those who rely on state services, while critics of related initiatives in the past may have raised concerns about funding and implementation.

Contention

While the overall sentiment has been positive, there remains some contention regarding the practicality of implementing the provisions of HB 2099. Questions have been raised about the resources required to effectively manage the issuance of identification cards and whether sufficient training and infrastructure are in place to support this initiative. Additionally, some legislators have expressed concerns over maintaining the security and privacy of personal information for individuals receiving state identification.