Washington 2023-2024 Regular Session

Washington Senate Bill SB6316

Introduced
2/16/24  
Refer
2/16/24  
Report Pass
2/22/24  
Refer
2/23/24  
Report Pass
2/26/24  
Engrossed
2/28/24  
Refer
2/29/24  
Report Pass
3/5/24  
Enrolled
3/8/24  
Chaptered
3/26/24  

Caption

Concerning the state route number 520 corridor.

Impact

The passage of SB6316 is expected to significantly shape state laws related to transportation funding and infrastructure development. It includes provisions for new funding mechanisms that are aimed at ensuring continued maintenance and upgrades to the corridor, which is a vital connection within the state. By prioritizing the 520 corridor, the law is positioned to enhance not only the infrastructure itself but also the economic landscape surrounding it by facilitating better transportation access and safety.

Summary

SB6316 is centered around the development and management of the State Route Number 520 corridor in Washington State. The bill addresses various aspects of infrastructure enhancements, including funding allocations and development strategies aimed at improving transportation flow and safety along this critical route. Advocates for the bill emphasize the necessity of upgrading the 520 corridor to meet the growing needs of the population and the economy, focusing on both immediate improvements and long-term strategic planning.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB6316 has been largely positive, particularly among policymakers and stakeholders who view the enhancements to the 520 corridor as essential for future growth and development. However, concerns have been raised regarding the allocation of state funds and whether the focus on one region may limit resources available for other transportation projects across the state. This sentiment highlights a balancing act between regional development needs and the equitable distribution of state transportation resources.

Contention

Notable points of contention have arisen around the bill's funding sources and the potential implications for statewide transportation priorities. Some legislators and advocacy groups express apprehensions about possible inequities that could emerge from favoring the 520 corridor over other routes that are equally in need of improvements. This debate underscores the challenges in prioritizing transportation projects in a way that addresses both immediate logistical concerns and broader statewide infrastructure needs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

WA SB5584

Addressing toll relief on the state route number 520 corridor during planned closures of Interstate 90 between Seattle and Bellevue.

WA HB2318

Concerning state route number 501.

WA SB6222

Concerning the number of district court judges.

WA SJM8009

Designating the State Route Number 3 overpass at the junction of Chico Way NW in Bremerton as the Joe Mentor memorial overpass.

WA SB5684

Concerning small works rosters.

WA SJM8008

Designating mileposts 45 to 51 of state route number 6 as the Washington state patrol trooper Justin R. Schaffer memorial highway.

WA HB1746

Concerning a state broadband map.

WA HB2335

Concerning state-tribal education compacts.

WA SB5522

Concerning the state capitol campus.

WA SB5269

Concerning Washington state manufacturing.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.