Washington Senate Bill SJM8011

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/25
• Refer: 1/30/25

Caption

Applying for a convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution relating to fiscal restraints on the federal government, the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit terms of office for federal officials and for members of congress.

Impact

If passed, SJM8011 would initiate a process that could lead to substantial changes in the Constitution, particularly concerning how the federal government operates and its authority over the states. By potentially instituting term limits for federal officials, the bill seeks to tackle issues surrounding long-term incumbency and promote fresh perspectives in government. The proposed fiscal restraints could also impact federal spending and budgeting processes, encouraging a more responsible and limited approach to government expenditures. The ramifications of such changes would be profound, as they could redefine the relationship between state and federal powers and influence legislative priorities at all levels of government.

Summary

SJM8011 is a resolution that applies for a convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution. The proposed amendments would focus on fiscal restraints on the federal government, clarify the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and establish term limits for federal officials and members of Congress. This resolution aims to address concerns regarding the perceived overreach of federal authority and the growing national debt, making it a significant legislative proposal in the context of current political discussions about government accountability and fiscal responsibility.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJM8011 is largely supportive among those who advocate for limited government and enhanced state rights. Proponents argue that a convention to propose these amendments is necessary to rein in federal power and improve government efficiency. Conversely, there are concerns voiced by some legislators and advocacy groups about the risks associated with a constitutional convention, such as the potential for unintended consequences or radical changes to the Constitution. This division reflects a broader national conversation about the role of government and the appropriateness of various checks on federal authority.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns over the implications of calling a convention and the possible outcomes of amendments that could be proposed. Critics fear that opening up the Constitution could lead to efforts to revise other protections enshrined within it, possibly affecting civil rights or entitlements. Additionally, there are debates about whether the calls for a convention are genuinely representative of the public interest or if they stem from more partisan motivations. This divergence of opinion underscores the complexity of enacting constitutional change and the various interests that must be considered.