Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB396

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/6/23
• Refer: 9/6/23
• Report Pass: 11/6/23
• Refer: 11/6/23
• Engrossed: 11/9/23
• Refer: 11/13/23
• Enrolled: 11/15/23
• Vetoed: 12/6/23
• Refer: 1/18/24
• Failed: 5/15/24

Caption

Fees for obtaining the official voter registration list. (FE)

Impact

The bill's implementation will notably affect the legislative landscape surrounding electoral transparency and access to voter data. By formalizing the fee structure for accessing voter registration lists, AB396 establishes a clear cost framework intended to regulate and limit the free access that may have been exploited in the past. While this could enhance operational efficiency, it also raises questions about potential barriers to access for individuals or organizations that may struggle with the associated fees.

Summary

Assembly Bill 396 (AB396) seeks to amend how the official voter registration list is accessed in Wisconsin by instituting a fee system for its retrieval. Under AB396, individuals can obtain a digital copy of the official registration list for a fee capped at $250, with additional costs applicable for physical copies to cover reproduction and postage. This change aims to streamline the process of accessing vital electoral data while also generating some funding for the administrative body that oversees these lists.

Sentiment

Discussions around AB396 appear to evoke mixed sentiments. Advocates assert that the introduction of fees is a necessary measure to protect the integrity of voter registration data and to ensure proper management of these lists. On the contrary, critics express concerns that the new fees could hinder transparency and deter civic engagement, particularly among grassroots organizations working to promote voter turnout and engagement. The sentiment reflects a broader debate on balancing accessibility with the need for regulatory oversight.

Contention

Notably, some points of contention revolve around the implications of imposing fees on accessing voter data. Opponents argue that this could disproportionately affect low-income individuals or smaller organizations, potentially leading to reduced engagement and oversight within the electoral process. Proponents counter that it is a straightforward adjustment necessary to maintain the integrity of data management. As this bill becomes law, ongoing conversations will likely continue surrounding its implementation and the observable outcomes on voter participation.