Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

Wisconsin Senate Bill SB146

Introduced
4/3/23  
Refer
4/3/23  

Caption

Management and preservation of records and correspondence of members of the legislature. (FE)

Impact

The impact of SB146 on state laws is significant as it alters how records related to legislative activities are preserved and made available to the public. Currently, the Public Records Board supervises the preservation of public records, but the correspondence of legislators has been shielded from this oversight. By repealing this exclusion, SB146 seeks to align legislative records with broader public records laws, potentially increasing public access to these documents and improving the overall accountability of elected officials.

Summary

SB146 aims to amend the state's public records management by repealing the exclusion of legislative records and correspondence from the definition of public records. This legislative initiative was introduced by Senators Larson and Spreitzer and has garnered support from various representatives. The removal of this exclusion is intended to enhance transparency and accountability within the state government by ensuring that the correspondence of lawmakers is subject to the same retention schedules as other public records.

Conclusion

Ultimately, SB146 represents a push towards greater governmental transparency and accountability by extending public records laws to cover legislative correspondence. The bill is positioned within a broader context of legislative reforms aimed at enhancing trust in government through improved access to information. As discussions progress, the balance between transparency and privacy will likely remain a central theme in the debate surrounding this bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB146 relate to concerns over privacy and the potential chilling effect on communication between legislators and their constituents. Some legislators may argue that subjecting their correspondence to public records laws could dissuade open and honest communication with the public, fearing that sensitive discussions may be disclosed. Opponents of the bill might also raise concerns about the operational impact on legislative offices, including the potential increased workload associated with managing and maintaining additional public records.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

WI AB164

Management and preservation of records and correspondence of members of the legislature. (FE)

WI SF1988

Correspondence in government record retention law correspondence definition; three-year retention period for correspondence establishment

WI HF4836

Correspondence in government record retention law defined, and minimum three-year retention period for correspondence provided.

WI HF428

Correspondence in government record retention law defined, and minimum three-year retention period for correspondence provided.

WI HB2716

Relating to fees charged for the management and preservation of the county clerk's records.

WI SB1609

Relating to fees charged for the management and preservation of the county clerk's records.

WI SF4822

Correspondence in government record retention law defining provision

WI HB0414

Records Management Amendments

WI SB1229

Relating to increases in the records archive fees and the records management and preservation fees charged by district and county clerks.

WI HB4062

Relating to the authority of a municipality to collect a records management and preservation fee.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.