Wisconsin 2023 2023-2024 Regular Session

Wisconsin Senate Bill SB166 Comm Sub / Analysis

                    Wisconsin Legislative Council 
ACT MEMO 
One Ea st Ma in Stre e t, Suite 401 • Ma dison, W I 53703 • (608) 266-1304 • le g.council@le gis.wisconsin.gov • http://www.le gis.wisconsin.gov/lc 
Prepared by: David Moore, Senior Staff Attorney, and Tom Koss, Staff Attorney 	December 15, 2023 
2023 Wisconsin Act 47 
[2023 Senate Bill 166] 
Wisconsin Code of Military 
Justice 
Members of the Wisconsin National Guard are subject to the Wisconsin Code of Military Justice 
(WCMJ), which codifies offenses that may be punished under the code and establishes procedures for 
enforcing the code. When serving on federal status, National Guard members are subject instead to the 
federal Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). 
2023 Wisconsin Act 47 makes a number of changes to the WCMJ. In particular, the act: clarifies the 
jurisdiction of military and civilian courts over offenses under the WCMJ; specifies the limits of 
punishment for violating the WCMJ’s punitive articles; and directs the Adjutant General to prescribe 
rules of procedure that apply to proceedings under the WCMJ and a policy regarding the treatment of 
victims of offenses under the WCMJ. The act also modifies and creates various punitive articles in the 
WCMJ to more closely align the WCMJ with the UCMJ.  
Jurisdiction of Courts-Martial 
Under the WCMJ, courts-martial have primary jurisdiction of “military offenses,” while civilian 
criminal courts have primary jurisdiction of “nonmilitary offenses” when an act or omission violates 
both the WCMJ and civilian criminal law. When a civilian court has primary jurisdiction over an 
offense, the National Guard may initiate a court-martial proceeding only after the civilian authority has 
declined to prosecute or dismiss the charge, provided that jeopardy has not attached.
1
  
For the purposes of establishing jurisdiction, the WCMJ defines “military offense” by enumerating the 
specific offenses this definition includes, and defines “nonmilitary offenses” as offenses that are in the 
state’s civilian penal statute and are not offenses under the WCMJ. Under prior law, however, the 
definition of “military offense” included several offenses that are offenses under both the WCMJ and 
civilian criminal law. 
The act clarifies that civilian authorities have primary jurisdiction over offenses that are prohibited 
under both Wisconsin’s Criminal Code and the WCMJ, by removing those offenses from the definition 
of “military offense” and repealing the definition of “nonmilitary offenses.” Under the act, civilian 
authorities have primary jurisdiction over the following offenses: rape and sexual assault; stalking; rape 
and sexual assault of a child; sexual misconduct; larceny and wrongful appropriation; robbery; forgery; 
maiming; arson; extortion; assault; burglary; housebreaking; and perjury.  
Limits of Punishment 
Prior law provided that the limits of punishment for violating an offense under the WCMJ are 
prescribed by the Governor, but may not exceed 10 years of confinement or constitute cruel or unusual 
punishment. The act adopts the limits of punishment under the UCMJ by incorporation, unless the 
                                                
1
 The National Guard may take administrative disciplinary actions against a person for violating an offense over which a 
civilian court has primary jurisdiction regardless of whether the civilian authority prosecutes the offense.  - 2 - 
Governor prescribes other limits. As under prior law, these limits may not exceed 10 years of 
confinement or constitute cruel or unusual punishment.  
Rules of Procedure for Courts-Martial 
Prior law authorized the Governor to prescribe pretrial, trial, and post-trial procedures, including 
modes of proof, for courts-martial cases arising under the WCMJ.  
The act modifies this provision to require the Adjutant General to prescribe in writing pretrial, trial, and 
post-trial procedures for courts-martial cases arising under the WCMJ and to make these procedures 
publicly available on DMA’s website.  
Policy on Treatment of Victims 
The Wisconsin Constitution and Wisconsin Statutes grant crime victims a variety of rights, including 
the right to be treated with dignity, respect, courtesy, sensitivity, and fairness. For these purposes, 
“crime victim” is defined, generally, as a person against whom a crime has been committed. A victim of 
an offense under the WCMJ may satisfy this definition of crime victim under some, but not all, 
circumstances. 
The act requires the Adjutant General to prescribe in writing, publish on the Department of Military 
Affairs (DMA)’s website, and implement a policy that ensures that any victim of an offense under the 
WCMJ is treated with dignity, respect, courtesy, sensitivity, and fairness. 
Punitive Articles Created or Modified 
Congress amends the UCMJ on a regular basis, but these changes do not affect the WCMJ unless 
subsequently adopted by the Wisconsin Legislature. The act creates and modifies various punitive 
articles to more closely align the WCMJ with the UCMJ. 
Prohibited Activities With a Military Recruit or Trainee by a Person in a Position of Trust 
The act creates a punitive article that prohibits an officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer who 
is in a training leadership position from engaging in a prohibited sexual activity with a specially 
protected junior member of the armed forces. It also prohibits a military recruiter from engaging in 
prohibited sexual activity with an applicant for military service or a specially protected junior member 
of the state military forces who is enlisted under a delayed entry program. This article parallels Article 
93a of the UCMJ, which was adopted in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 
2016.  
Under the act, prohibited sexual activity means any sexual act or sexual contact or any attempt or 
solicitation to commit a sexual act or sexual contact. A specially protected junior member of the armed 
forces is a member of the state military forces who is one of the following: (1) assigned to or awaiting 
assignment to basic training or other initial active duty for training; (2) a cadet, midshipman, an officer 
candidate, or student in any other officer qualification program; or (3) in any program that, by 
regulation of the Secretary of the Army or Air Force, is identified as a training program for initial career 
qualification. Consent is not a defense for any conduct at issue. 
Retaliation 
The act creates a punitive article that prohibits wrongfully taking or threatening to take an adverse 
personnel action against any person or wrongfully withholding or threatening to withhold a favorable 
personnel action with respect to any person, if done with intent to do any of the following: (1) retaliate 
against any person for reporting or planning to report a criminal or military offense; (2) retaliate  - 3 - 
against any person for making or planning to make a protected communication; or (3) discourage any 
person from reporting a criminal or military offense or making a protected communication.  
Under the act, a communication qualifies as a protected communication under two circumstances. The 
first is if it is a lawful communication to a member of Congress, member of the Wisconsin Legislature, 
the Governor, or an inspector general. The second is if it satisfies both of the following conditions: (1) 
the communication is to a member of the U.S. Department of Defense, a member of the National Guard 
Bureau, a law enforcement officer, a state agency, a legislative service agency, a person in the chain of 
command, or a court-martial proceeding; and (2) in the communication, a member of the state military 
forces complains of, or discloses evidence that, the person reasonably believes constitutes evidence of a 
violation of a law or regulation, gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or 
a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety. 
This provision is modeled on Article 132 of the UCMJ, which was adopted in the fiscal year 2016 NDAA. 
Sexual Assault and Abusive Sexual Contact 
The act generally aligns the elements of sexual assault and abusive sexual contact under the WCMJ with 
the elements of these offenses under the UCMJ by making two changes. First, the act modifies the 
WCMJ to provide that, as under the UCMJ, a person who commits a sexual act or sexual contact upon 
another person without that person’s consent is guilty of sexual assault or abusive sexual contact, 
respectively. Second, the act amends another provision of the article pertaining to sexual assault and 
abusive sexual contact that enumerates various other types of conduct that may constitute sexual 
assault or abusive sexual contact to generally align this provision with the UCMJ. 
Sexual Harassment 
The act creates a punitive article in the WCMJ that prohibits sexual harassment and parallels an 
amendment made to Article 134 of the UCMJ in the fiscal year 2022 NDAA. Specifically, any person 
who either knowingly makes an unwelcome sexual advance, demand, or request for a sexual favor or 
knowingly engages in other unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature is guilty of sexual harassment, if the 
conduct meets two conditions.  
First, the sexual advance, demand, request, or conduct of a sexual nature must do either of the 
following:  
 Under the circumstances, cause a reasonable person to believe, and actually cause at least one 
person to believe, that submission to or rejection would be made, either explicitly or implicitly, a 
term or condition of that person’s job, pay, career, benefits, or entitlements or would be used as a 
basis for decisions affecting that person’s job, pay, career, benefits, or entitlements.  
 Be so severe, repetitive, or pervasive that a reasonable person would perceive, and at least one 
person actually perceived, an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment. 
Second, the sexual advance, demand, request, or conduct of a sexual nature must be to the prejudice of 
good order and discipline in the state military forces or of a nature to bring discredit upon the state 
military forces, or both. 
Conduct Unbecoming an Officer 
Article 133 of the WCMJ prohibits any commissioned officer, cadet, candidate, or midshipman from 
engaging in conduct unbecoming of an officer and a gentleman. The act removes the language referring  - 4 - 
to “and a gentleman” to eliminate gender-specific language and parallel a similar modification to the 
UCMJ.   
Effective date: December 8, 2024 
For a full history of the act, visit the Legislature’s bill history page.  
DM:TK:ksm