West Virginia House Bill HB4246

West Virginia 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/18/22
• Refer: 1/18/22
• Refer: 1/27/22

Caption

Authorizing the Division of Natural Resources to promulgate a legislative rule relating to Revocation of Hunting and Fishing Licenses.

Impact

The implications of HB 4246 on state law are significant, as it formalizes the process through which the Division of Natural Resources can manage hunting and fishing licenses. This legislative approval mechanism ensures that the regulations are aligned with state directives and responsive to any legislative reviews or objections. By allowing the Division to establish these rules, the bill could lead to a more structured and possibly stricter enforcement of licensing requirements, potentially affecting hunters and fishers in West Virginia.

Summary

House Bill 4246 aims to amend and reenact section 64-10-1 of the Code of West Virginia, providing the Division of Natural Resources with the authority to promulgate a legislative rule concerning the revocation of hunting and fishing licenses. This bill is a step forward in clarifying the authority under which the Division can operate, especially in modifying rules to ensure compliance with legislative mandates. It emphasizes the importance of regulations that govern hunting and fishing activities in the state, setting a framework for how licenses may be revoked.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 4246 appears to be largely supportive among conservation advocates and regulatory agencies, as the clear guidelines for revocation of licenses can enhance the protection of natural resources. However, there may be concerns among the hunting and fishing community regarding enforcement and the potential for increased restrictions. Overall, the bill is seen as a necessary move to maintain the integrity of natural resources through responsible regulation.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to HB 4246 may revolve around the extent of the Division's power to revoke licenses and how transparently these decisions are made. Stakeholders might debate the balance between protecting natural resources and ensuring fair treatment for individuals holding licenses. Additionally, there may be concerns about the process of rule-making and the involvement of public opinion in shaping these regulations. This discussion will likely highlight the critical need for oversight and accountability within the Division to prevent arbitrary or unjust revocations.