West Virginia Senate Bill SB277

West Virginia 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/22
• Refer: 1/17/22

Caption

Office of Technology rule relating to Chief Information Officer review

Impact

The passage of SB277 is expected to have significant implications for how state technology initiatives are managed and reviewed. By granting the Office of Technology the authority to create these rules, the bill aims to standardize evaluation processes across state agencies, ensuring that technology deployments are efficient and aligned with best practices. This could lead to an improved framework for technology use in governmental operations, potentially leading to better service delivery to the public and enhanced data security protocols.

Summary

Senate Bill 277 is a legislative measure introduced in West Virginia aiming to empower the Office of Technology to promulgate rules related to Chief Information Officer (CIO) reviews. This bill seeks to amend the Code of West Virginia, specifically section 64-2-1. The primary objective of the bill is to formalize the rules that guide the evaluation and oversight of the state's technology initiatives, enhancing the governance framework surrounding information management and technology deployment within state operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB277 appears to be neutral to positive among legislative members involved in discussions. While emphasizing the necessity for streamlined regulations within state technology management, there may be concerns regarding how these regulations will be implemented and enforced. Stakeholders recognize the importance of effective technology governance but may differ in views on the operational details and specific rules that will be established as a result of this bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB277 hinge on the balance of power and the delegation of authority to the Office of Technology. Critics may raise concerns about whether the bill grants excessive power to a single office and how this might affect transparency and accountability in technology management. The legislation prioritizes uniformity but must also navigate potential pushback from entities that may seek more localized control over technology practices.