West Virginia House Bill HB2914

West Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/23
• Refer: 1/23/23
• Engrossed: 3/6/23
• Enrolled: 3/10/23
• Passed: 3/11/23
• Chaptered: 5/1/23

Caption

Supplementing and amending appropriations to the Governor’s Office - Civil Contingent Fund

Impact

The enactment of HB 2914 is expected to have a significant impact on the state budget as it increases the financial resources available to the Governor’s Office. The allocation of these funds will enhance the office's ability to manage emergencies or critical situations that may arise, creating a buffer for the state in times of unexpected financial needs. This bill showcases the legislature's response to the financial standing of the state while also ensuring that executive powers are supported through adequate funding.

Summary

House Bill 2914 addresses the appropriations of public funds from the remaining unappropriated surplus balance in the State Fund, General Revenue, specifically for the Governor’s Office – Civil Contingent Fund for the fiscal year 2023. This legislation aims to supplement the current budget allocated to the Governor’s Office, allowing for an additional $85 million that could address various unforeseen expenses or projects deemed necessary by the executive branch. Such funding is typically necessary to ensure the government's operations continue smoothly without any budgetary constraints.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 2914 appears to be positive, as evidenced by its unanimous passage in the House of Delegates. A vote of 32-0 signifies a strong bipartisan agreement on the necessity of this supplementary funding. Legislators likely recognize the importance of a flexible and adequately funded Governor’s Office in maintaining effective governance, especially in times of fiscal uncertainty.

Contention

While the bill passed with no opposition, potential points of contention may arise regarding the broader implications of supplemental appropriations and the Governor's discretion over such funds. Concerns might center on the accountability of fund usage and whether such a significant appropriation aligns with transparency and responsible fiscal management. The lack of vocal opposition suggests that these discussions were either not prominent or that stakeholders largely agree on the imperative of supporting the Governor's functions through supplementary funding.