West Virginia House Bill HCR63

West Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/1/23
• Refer: 3/1/23

Caption

Proclaiming and making the AR-15 the official rifle of the State of West Virginia.

Impact

If enacted, HCR63 would not lead to direct legislative changes regarding gun laws, but it would signify an official endorsement of the AR-15 rifle within the state’s symbolism. This could reinforce cultural values surrounding firearms in West Virginia and potentially influence perspectives on gun ownership and rights among residents. It serves to highlight West Virginians’ pride in their historical relationship with firearms, thereby strengthening community ties to this particular model of rifle.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 63 (HCR63) proposes to designate the AR-15 rifle as the official rifle of West Virginia. The resolution emphasizes the historical significance and popularity of the AR-15 among gun owners in the state, noting its various uses ranging from hunting and home defense to competitive shooting. Advocates of the bill argue that recognizing the AR-15 as an official state symbol reflects the culture of firearm ownership in West Virginia and acknowledges the rifle's role in the state's heritage.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR63 tends to be supportive among gun rights advocates who view the resolution as a celebration of Second Amendment rights and a testament to West Virginians’ traditions. However, critics may perceive it as controversial, especially given broader national discussions about firearm regulation and safety. While many citizens may celebrate the resolution, it can also provoke opposition from those concerned about the implications of symbolically endorsing a military-style firearm.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HCR63 include the ongoing national debate over gun control and firearm-related violence. Critics argue that promoting the AR-15 as a state symbol might be seen as insensitive or inappropriate in light of incidents involving such firearms in mass shootings. Additionally, concerns about the broader implications of officially endorsing a military-style rifle may arise, especially in discussions around public safety and legislative priorities.