West Virginia House Bill HCR74

West Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/8/23
• Report Pass: 3/8/23
• Refer: 3/8/23
• Report Pass: 3/11/23
• Engrossed: 3/11/23

Caption

Requesting a study to assess whether the code contains outdated excessive or unnecessary provisions.

Impact

The resolution underscores a significant concern regarding the length and complexity of the Code of West Virginia, which has expanded dramatically since its initial codification. Supporters argue that a thorough review will help streamline regulations, making it easier for businesses to operate and, in turn, boost economic development. It suggests that the legislative oversight historically leans towards skepticism of free market principles, leading to an accumulation of regulatory constraints that may not serve the current economic landscape.

Summary

HCR74 is a House Concurrent Resolution from West Virginia requesting a comprehensive study to determine if the current Code of West Virginia contains excessive or outdated provisions that hinder innovation and free enterprise. The resolution aims to identify redundant regulations that may impede market entry for private entrepreneurs and disincentivize investment, ultimately aiming to maximize the state’s economic potential. It emphasizes the need for an evaluation of the legal framework that governs business operations within the state, arguing that an outdated code could stifle economic growth and personal freedom.

Sentiment

Sentiment around HCR74 appears mostly favorable among its proponents, who view the resolution as a necessary step toward modernizing West Virginia's legislative framework to better align with capitalist principles. They argue that reducing bureaucratic red tape will encourage entrepreneurship and a more vibrant economic environment. However, there may be concerns from those who perceive this as a potential overreach that could minimize consumer protections or lead to an undermining of local governance.

Contention

The notable point of contention surrounding HCR74 revolves around the implications of the study it proposes. Critics could argue that hastily repealing longstanding provisions without careful consideration could lead to the loss of essential protections for workers and consumers. The resolution also implicitly critiques historical legislative decisions that favor regulation over market freedom, suggesting a broader ideological divide on how best to balance economic growth with public welfare.