Alaska 2023-2024 Regular Session

Alaska House Bill HB17

Introduced
1/19/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Introduced
1/19/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Engrossed
3/22/24  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Engrossed
3/22/24  

Caption

Contraceptives Coverage:insure;med Assist

Impact

The bill aims to strengthen reproductive health access across the state, particularly through provisions that prohibit insurers from denying coverage based on changes in contraceptive methods or requiring deductibles. It represents a significant legislative move to enhance support for women's health and autonomy, ensuring that financial barriers do not impede necessary medical choices related to contraceptives. The blanket coverage for consultations and medical services associated with contraceptives further demonstrates a commitment to comprehensive reproductive healthcare.

Summary

House Bill 17 focuses on enhancing insurance coverage for contraceptives and associated medical services in Alaska. The legislation mandates that healthcare insurers provide coverage for prescription contraceptives without requiring cost-sharing from insured individuals when provided by participating providers. Additionally, it ensures that healthcare providers are compensated for dispensing contraceptives intended for a 12-month period, promoting easier access to contraceptive options for individuals relying on such services.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB 17 appears to be supportive among legislators advocating for women's health rights, reflecting a growing acknowledgment of the importance of accessible contraceptive options. However, opposition exists from groups concerned about potential religious exemptions for certain employers, which could undermine the bill's intent by allowing some health plans to opt-out of providing these benefits. This tension between reproductive rights and religious freedom continues to shape the conversation surrounding the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns regarding the religious exemption provisions that allow entities with religious objections to opt-out of certain coverage requirements. Critics argue that this may lead to unequal access to contraceptive services, particularly for employees of religious institutions. Furthermore, the necessity for the Department of Health to seek federal approval for amendments to the state Medicaid plan, to align with the bill's requirements, raises questions about implementation timelines and the potential effects on low-income individuals who rely on these services.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ S3434

Clarifies coverage requirements for health insurers of over-the-counter contraceptive drugs.

ME LD2203

An Act to Require Health Insurance Coverage for Federally Approved Nonprescription Oral Hormonal Contraceptives and Nonprescription Emergency Contraceptives

NJ A1182

Expands requirements for health insurers and Medicaid program to cover prescriptions for contraceptives for up to 12 months.

ME LD163

An Act to Require Health Insurance Coverage for Federally Approved Nonprescription Oral Hormonal Contraceptives and Nonprescription Emergency Contraceptives

WV HB2557

Increasing access to contraceptive drugs, devices, and procedures

MS HB1418

The Right to Contraception Act; create.

NJ S1492

Requires health insurance coverage and limits cost sharing for certain birth control methods.

NJ S263

Requires health insurance coverage and limits cost sharing for certain birth control methods.