Alaska 2023-2024 Regular Session

Alaska House Bill HB302

Introduced
1/31/24  
Report Pass
5/11/24  
Introduced
1/31/24  
Report Pass
5/11/24  

Caption

Employee Retirement Benefits/sbs

Impact

If enacted, HB 302 will modify existing laws in the context of retirement contributions for state employees. It will require participating employers to contribute a specified percentage of their employees' wages into these individual employee annuity accounts. The anticipated effect includes a more robust retirement plan for peace officers, firefighters, and a subset of teachers, potentially improving employee morale and retention in these demanding professions.

Summary

House Bill 302 addresses the retirement benefits for various state employees, specifically targeting peace officers and firefighters hired after June 30, 2006, as well as certain teachers hired after June 30, 2024. The bill proposes amendments that establish supplemental employee benefits, allowing eligible employees to contribute a percentage of their wages into individual annuity accounts managed by the Department of Administration. This move aims to enhance the financial security for those serving in critical state roles by providing additional benefits tailored to their needs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 302 appears to be generally positive among lawmakers, particularly from those advocating for improved compensation and benefits for state employees. Supporters argue that enhancing retirement benefits is essential for attracting and retaining skilled professionals in public services. However, some fiscal conservatives may express concerns regarding the long-term financial implications of these added benefits on the state budget, leading to divided opinions in the discussions.

Contention

One notable point of contention in discussions regarding HB 302 is the balance between providing adequate benefits and ensuring fiscal responsibility. Critics of the bill may argue about the sustainability of these retirement benefits, especially for newly hired workers, while proponents defend the necessity of such provisions to maintain a motivated workforce. Additional debates may arise about the effectiveness and efficiency of the new benefit structure, particularly regarding how it aligns with existing retirement systems and the overall impact on state finances.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

AK HB107

Employee Retirement Benefits/sbs

AK SB55

Trs Contr Rate; Pers/trs Soc Secur Or Sbs

AK HB38

Teachers & Supplemental Employee Benefits

AK SB200

Trs Contr Rate; Pers Soc Security Or Sbs

AK HB78

Retirement Systems; Defined Benefit Opt.

AK SB28

Retirement Systems; Defined Benefit Opt.

AK SB88

Retirement Systems; Defined Benefit Opt.

AK SB11

Teachers & Pub Employee Retirement Plans

AK SB27

Teachers & Pub Employee Retirement Plans

AK HB22

Peace Officer/firefighter Retire Benefits

Similar Bills

TX HB1974

Relating to creating a defined contribution retirement plan for persons eligible to participate in a public statewide retirement system.

AZ SB1148

CORP; defined contributions

TX HB2506

Relating to creating defined contribution retirement plans for persons eligible to participate in the Employees Retirement System of Texas and the Teacher Retirement System of Texas.

AZ HB2015

Retirement plans; plan election; rehire

MI HB5328

Retirement: judges; employee contribution and match; increase. Amends sec. 714 of 1992 PA 234 (MCL 38.2664).

MI SB0262

Retirement: state employees; annuity option; provide for. Amends secs. 55, 58, 63, 63a & 69 of 1943 PA 240 (MCL 38.55 et seq.).

MI SB0497

Retirement: state employees; annuity option; provide for. Amends secs. 55, 58, 63, 63a & 69 of 1943 PA 240 (MCL 38.55 et seq.).

ND HB1548

The public employees retirement system retirement plans; to provide an exemption; to provide a contingent effective date; and to provide an effective date.