Alaska 2023-2024 Regular Session

Alaska House Bill HJR10

Introduced
3/6/23  
Introduced
3/6/23  
Report Pass
3/15/23  
Refer
3/6/23  
Engrossed
3/20/23  
Report Pass
3/15/23  
Refer
3/22/23  
Engrossed
3/20/23  
Report Pass
3/27/23  
Refer
3/22/23  
Report Pass
3/27/23  
Enrolled
10/16/23  
Enrolled
3/27/23  
Enrolled
10/16/23  

Caption

Nat'l Park Service; Hunting In Preserves

Impact

The resolution underscores the state's belief that the proposed National Park Service rule undermines state authority and extends federal control over hunting practices. By opposing this rule, the Alaska Legislature aims to protect traditional hunting methods for residents, particularly concerning the hunting of bears, wolves, and caribou. The bill invokes the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, maintaining that the proposed federal limitations challenge both state sovereignty in wildlife management and community rights to engage in customary practices.

Summary

HJR10 is a resolution from the Alaska Legislature disapproving a proposed rule by the National Park Service that would limit certain non-subsistence hunting methods in national preserves. The resolution emphasizes that the state has historically had the authority to manage wildlife both on state and federal lands since the establishment of state management authority in 1959. The bill conveys a strong stance against federal overreach regarding local wildlife management and hunting practices, aligning with the state's constitutional and statutory provisions.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HJR10 appears to be focused on defending state rights against what is perceived as federal overreach. Legislative discussions likely reflected strong support from various lawmakers who prioritize hunting traditions and state management mechanisms. However, potential opponents of the resolution may include environmental groups concerned about wildlife conservation impacts and the long-term effects of predator control practices that are seen as harmful.

Contention

Notable points of contention center around the balance of federal and state power in wildlife management. Proponents of HJR10 are staunchly against any imposition on Alaska's traditional hunting practices, while critics may argue that unrestricted hunting practices can lead to ecological concerns. The resolution reflects a broader contention within the ongoing debate about wildlife management practices, local customs, and federal authority over natural resources.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.