Alaska 2023-2024 Regular Session

Alaska House Bill HJR13

Introduced
3/31/23  
Introduced
3/31/23  
Report Pass
3/11/24  
Refer
3/31/23  
Report DNP
3/21/24  
Report Pass
3/11/24  
Report DNP
3/21/24  

Caption

Call Fed. Constitutional Conv:term Limits

Impact

If enacted, HJR13 could potentially propel discussions across the country regarding the implementation of term limits at the federal level. By encouraging other states to adopt similar resolutions, it aims to reach the two-thirds majority threshold required for Congress to convene a convention focused on this issue. Such an amendment could amend existing practices in federal elections and reshape the landscape of political engagement in the United States, possibly leading to increased turnover and diversity in elected positions.

Summary

HJR13 is a resolution by the Alaska State Legislature requesting the United States Congress to call a convention of the states for the purpose of proposing an amendment to the Constitution that would impose term limits on members of the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. This resolution symbolizes a response to concerns regarding long-term incumbency in federal positions and aims to address perceived abuses of power that can arise from unlimited terms in office. It emphasizes the role of state legislatures as guardians of liberty against such federal overreach as well as the need for greater democratic accountability in federal elections.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJR13 appears to be one of cautious optimism among its supporters, who view the imposition of term limits as a safeguard against the erosion of democratic principles. Advocates argue that limiting terms can rejuvenate political representation and empower new leaders. However, there may be skepticism and concern among opponents regarding the efficacy of term limits, questioning whether such measures truly address the systemic issues within the political system or merely shift them around without providing meaningful solutions.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding this resolution include the complexities of enacting constitutional amendments and the implications it carries for federal power dynamics. Critics may argue that term limits do not necessarily prevent political lobbying or the entrenchment of political elites, as those in power could still manipulate such a system. Furthermore, the process of calling a convention to propose amendments is fraught with uncertainties, as it opens the door to various proposals that could stray from the original intent, potentially complicating the national political landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.