If SR2 is enacted, it may lead to a coordinated effort among states pushing for significant constitutional amendments. The resolution aims to clarify and document the current standing of other states' requests, which is crucial for determining whether the threshold for convening a constitutional convention has been met. The Attorney General's findings could potentially influence future legislative actions, either prompting additional requests or modifying strategies for engaging with federal authorities.
Summary
Senate Resolution 2 (SR2), introduced by Senator Myers, urges the Governor of Alaska to instruct the Attorney General to assess the number of other states that have applied for a constitutional convention under Article V of the U.S. Constitution. The resolution emphasizes the congressional obligation to call a convention when two-thirds of state legislatures make such a request. This measure follows previous calls made by Alaska's legislature for a convention to propose amendments aimed at imposing federal fiscal restraints and limiting government powers.
Contention
The resolution does not specify the exact amendments that Alaska would seek but refers to previous proposals focused on fiscal restraints and limiting federal powers. This can lead to contention as various political factions hold differing views on federalism, the scope of government authority, and the potential consequences of a convention. Critics may argue that initiating a constitutional convention could open up unforeseen risks, while proponents believe it is vital for restoring balance between state and federal powers.
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.
(Constitutional Amendment) Requires legislative approval of a proposed constitutional amendment in two sessions before being submitted to the electors for ratification