Alabama House Bill HB27

Alabama 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/22
• Refer: 1/11/22

Caption

Discrimination, to make it unlawful to deny an individual full and equal employment of public accommodations based on certain protected classes, to make it unlawful for a local school board to discriminate against an individual based on certain protected classes, and to make it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against an applicant or employee based on certain protected classes

Impact

If passed, HB27 would create a significant state cause of action against employers, employment agencies, and labor organizations found to be discriminating against individuals based on the aforementioned protected classes. The bill introduces mechanisms for individuals who face discrimination to seek legal recourse without the fear of incurring court fees or costs. This proposed legal framework not only empowers individuals but also mandates compliance among entities in maintaining fair and equal treatment protocols within their operations.

Summary

House Bill 27 aims to strengthen anti-discrimination laws within the state by prohibiting discriminatory practices based on a set of defined protected classes. Under the bill, it becomes unlawful for any person or entity to deny any individual full and equal enjoyment of public accommodations, as well as prohibit local school boards, employers, employment agencies, and labor organizations from engaging in discriminatory acts towards individuals based on their race, sex, age, disability, or national origin. This legislative action seeks to promote equality and combat discrimination more effectively within the state.

Contention

The proposed legislation may face opposition regarding its implications for local governance and business practices. Critics might argue that HB27 could impose unnecessary constraints on private organizations and local authorities, limiting their ability to develop individualized policies based on community values. Furthermore, some may express concern over potential legal challenges stemming from the bill's provisions, citing fears that it could lead to a surge in litigation against businesses and institutions that may inadvertently violate the new mandates.