Alabama House Bill HB357

Alabama 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/15/22
• Refer: 2/15/22

Caption

Electrical Contractors, Alabama Board of, board membership revised, board authorized to subpoena witnesses and investigate complaints, expiration of licenses, local business licenses texting deleted, Secs. 34-36-3, 34-36-4, 34-36-6, 34-36-7, 34-36-8, 34-36-9, 34-36-13, 34-36-16 am'd.

Impact

The amendments outlined in HB357 are expected to streamline the licensing process for electrical contractors and make it easier for individuals to enter the profession. By shortening the timeframe for restoring expired licenses from five years to two years, the bill effectively reduces barriers for contractors looking to continue their practice after a lapse in licensure. However, it also limits local governments' authority to impose additional requirements for electrical contracting licenses, which may lead to concerns regarding local governance and the ability to address specific community needs.

Summary

House Bill 357 proposes amendments to the regulations governing electrical contractors in Alabama. The bill aims to define the term 'electrical worker' and establish a framework for provisional licensing. Notably, it removes references to 'master electrician' and specifies the responsibilities of the Alabama Board of Electrical Contractors, including the investigation of complaints and the ability to subpoena witnesses. Under the new provisions, individuals previously issued a provisional license will be given a three-year window to pass the licensure examination, with the board waiving examination fees for one attempt.

Contention

A significant point of contention among stakeholders pertains to the removal of local jurisdictional control in the licensing process. Critics argue that this may hinder the ability of municipalities to ensure compliance with local standards and safety regulations. Additionally, while supporters of the bill advocate for uniformity and efficiency across the state, opponents fear that the centralization of power within the state board could undermine local oversight and potentially compromise safety standards in electrical contracting.