Alabama House Bill HB484

Alabama 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/22
• Refer: 3/10/22
• Engrossed: 3/29/22
• Refer: 3/29/22
• Enrolled: 3/31/22
• Chaptered: 3/31/22
• Passed: 3/31/22

Caption

Cullman Co., coroner, compensation, Sec. 45-22-60 am'd.

Impact

In addition to the salary adjustments, HB484 outlines benefits associated with the position of coroner. These include participation in the county health insurance plan and provisions for office space and a county automobile for performing duties. The bill also allows for the reimbursement of any actual expenses incurred by the coroner in the execution of their duties, thus providing a more comprehensive framework for compensation and support for the coroner’s office. These changes aim to enhance the operational capacity of the coroner and ensure their ability to fulfill their responsibilities effectively.

Summary

House Bill 484 relates specifically to the Coroner's compensation in Cullman County, Alabama. The bill amends Section 45-22-60 of the Code of Alabama 1975, increasing the annual salary of the county's coroner from $25,000 to $35,000. This increase is set to take effect for the term of office beginning after the 2022 General Election. The bill also ensures that any uniform increases granted to all county employees by the Cullman County Commission would similarly apply to the coroner's salary, highlighting an effort to align the coroner's compensation with that of other county officials.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB484 appears to be generally positive, with wide support reflected in the voting history. The bill passed the House unanimously with 24 votes in favor and no opposition, indicating bipartisan support for increasing the compensation of the coroner in Cullman County. This consensus reflects an acknowledgment of the importance of the coroner's role and the need to ensure adequate compensation for public service positions.

Contention

Notably, HB484 does not appear to have significant points of contention or opposition during the legislative discussions, likely owing to its localized focus and the relatively straightforward nature of the salary adjustment. The unanimous passage suggests that the bill was largely uncontroversial among lawmakers, which often indicates that it aligns with broader community values regarding fair compensation and support for local government officials.