Alabama Senate Bill SB248

Alabama 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/22/22
• Refer: 2/22/22

Caption

Child-care facilities, Dept of Human Resources, require DHR to revise certain standards regulating child-care facilities, requires DHR to adopt rules, Sec. 38-7-22 added; Secs. 38-7-2, 38-7-3, 38-7-5, 38-7-7, 38-7-12, 38-7-13, 38-7-14, 38-7-20, 38-13-4 am'd.

Impact

The bill introduces a significant shift in the handling of criminal history background checks for employees of child-care facilities, which will now be deemed valid for a five-year period, unless a new criminal investigation occurs. This amendment is aimed at easing the employment process within the sector by allowing individuals with past criminal activity, provided a certain time frame has elapsed, to seek employment without being automatically disqualified. Such changes could help address workforce shortages in child-care settings, which have been a persistent issue.

Summary

SB248 seeks to revise and enhance the regulatory framework for child-care facilities in Alabama by mandating the Department of Human Resources (DHR) to update its standards regarding various operational protocols. Key changes include revisions to advertising practices, employment qualification standards, and recordkeeping procedures specific to child-care facilities. As part of its effort to modernize the licensing rules, the bill also establishes data reporting requirements that facilities must adhere to, thereby increasing transparency in the childcare sector.

Contention

However, the legislation has raised concerns among various stakeholders who fear that relaxing the background check regulations could compromise child safety. Critics argue that allowing individuals with potentially serious past infractions to work in childcare settings poses a risk to children under their care. Additionally, the provision that permits child-care employees to work extended shifts might exacerbate the issue of overworked staff, further affecting the quality of care provided. This balance between improving employment opportunities and maintaining strict safety measures remains a contentious point in discussions surrounding the bill.