Alabama Senate Bill SB90

Alabama 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/22
• Refer: 1/13/22
• Engrossed: 2/2/22
• Refer: 2/3/22
• Enrolled: 4/5/22
• Chaptered: 4/5/22
• Passed: 4/5/22

Caption

Assault in the second degree, physical injury to employee of Dept. of Human Resouces or social worker, included in offense, Sec. 13A-6-21 am'd.

Impact

The legislative modification established by SB90 elevates the legal protections afforded to specific groups of professionals who are often vulnerable to assault while fulfilling their duties. The bill classifies second-degree assault as a Class C felony when inflicted on these individuals, thereby increasing the potential legal consequences for offenders and signaling a strong stance against violence directed at public-serving employees. By doing so, SB90 aims to reinforce public safety and underscores the importance of the work these professionals do.

Summary

SB90, relating to crimes and offenses, primarily amends Section 13A-6-21 of the Code of Alabama to expand the scope of assault in the second degree. The bill now includes specific provisions for causing physical injury to various professionals during the course of their duties, including peace officers, health care workers, teachers, and employees within the Department of Human Resources. This change reflects an emphasis on protecting those who serve the public and ensures stiffer penalties for assaults on these individuals while they are performing their roles.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB90 appears to show broad support within legislative discussions, as the bill passed with a unanimous vote in the Senate (28-0). Proponents argue that this legal enhancement is necessary to safeguard individuals who may face violence in their professional capacities. However, there may be concerns regarding the practical implications of enforcing such laws and whether existing protections were inadequate or if this bill represents an overreach.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between enhancing protections for public servants and the potential implications for individuals accused of these new assault classifications. Critics may argue that existing laws already provide sufficient protections and that new classifications could complicate the legal framework concerning assault. This aspect could lead to future debates around law enforcement practices and the impact on community relations.