Relating to health care facilities; to add Section 22-21-437 to the Code of Alabama 1975; to require health care facilities to adopt certain visitation policies; to provide that patients have a right to certain visitation; to allow patients to designate an essential caregiver and to guarantee that caregiver certain visitation rights; to prohibit a health care facility from adopting a visitation policy that is more stringent than certain employee policies; to prohibit a health care facility from requiring visitors to show proof of vaccination or from prohibiting consensual physical contact between visitors and patients; to provide for the circumstances in which patients may not be denied visitors; to require health care facilities to provide visitation policies to the Department of Public Health; to require the Department of Public Health to develop a mechanism for complaints; to prohibit any suspension or modification by emergency rule or order; and to repeal Sections 22-21-430 through 22-21-436, Code of Alabama 1975, relating to hospital visitation during a public health emergency.
The proposed changes are intended to create a more patient-centric environment in health care facilities, framing visitation as a fundamental right. In essence, HB3 repeals previous laws that restricted visitation during public health emergencies and ensures that no visitation policies can be more stringent than existing policies for health care staff. By clarifying visitor rights and requiring facilities to outline and submit their policies to the Department of Public Health, the bill aims to establish a consistent framework for visitation across the state.
House Bill 3 (HB3) focuses on revising visitation policies for health care facilities in Alabama. The bill proposes that patients, clients, or residents of these facilities have the right to visit with any individual of their choosing during designated visiting hours. Furthermore, it introduces the concept of 'essential caregivers' who can be designated by the patient, ensuring they receive at least two hours of visitation each day, irrespective of other visitation rights. This initiative aims to improve the quality of life for patients by allowing more personal interactions with their chosen individuals during their care.
During discussions surrounding the bill, there were differing opinions among stakeholders. Proponents argue that the bill would significantly enhance emotional well-being and social support for patients in care facilities. In contrast, opponents expressed concerns that such mandates might impose regulatory burdens on health care facilities, particularly during public health crises, where infection control measures may necessitate stricter visitation controls. The prohibition against requiring vaccination proof for visitors could also raise alarms about health risks during ongoing or future health emergencies.