Relating to voting; to prohibit any person from distributing, ordering, requesting, collecting, completing, obtaining, or delivering an absentee ballot application or absentee ballot of another person in certain circumstances; to provide for exceptions; to prohibit a person from receiving a payment or providing a payment to another person for distributing, ordering, requesting, collecting, completing, obtaining, or delivering an absentee ballot application or absentee ballot of another person in certain circumstance; and in connection therewith would have as its purpose or effect the requirement of a new or increased expenditure of local funds within the meaning of Section 111.05 of the Constitution of Alabama of 2022.
The bill introduces strict criminal penalties for violations, ranging from Class D felonies for unauthorized distribution of absentee ballots to Class B felonies for those who pay others for such actions. This punitive approach aims to deter fraudulent activities associated with absentee ballots and enforce accountability among individuals involved in the voting process. By defining these actions as crimes, HB209 emphasizes the seriousness of maintaining the integrity of elections within the state.
House Bill 209 (HB209) primarily addresses the distribution and handling of absentee ballots in Alabama. It establishes prohibitions against individuals distributing, ordering, requesting, collecting, completing, obtaining, or delivering absentee ballot applications or absentee ballots for others under specific circumstances. The legislation aims to safeguard the integrity of absentee voting by limiting who can assist voters in these processes, thereby mitigating potential abuses. Exceptions to this prohibition exist, notably allowing assistance from close family members and specific official election personnel, ensuring that those in need of help can still receive it.
Critics of HB209 express concerns regarding potential voter disenfranchisement, particularly targeting individuals who may require help in completing their absentee ballots, such as disabled or elderly voters. While the bill seeks to enhance election integrity, opponents argue that its stringent restrictions could hinder legitimate assistance and lead to confusion or intimidation among voters seeking help. The balance between preventing fraud and ensuring accessible voting is a centerpiece of the debate surrounding this legislation.
Although the bill is projected to necessitate an increase in local expenditures regarding election administration due to its requirements, it qualifies for exemptions under certain constitutional provisions. This exemption could mean that local governments may not have the burdensome obligation of additional voter system costs, alleviating some financial impact as they adapt to the new regulations.