Alabama House Bill HB281

Alabama 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/11/23
• Refer: 4/11/23
• Report Pass: 4/19/23

Caption

Relating to detention facilities; to amend Section 14-6-22, Code of Alabama 1975, to require a defendant convicted of a misdemeanor to pay housing and maintenance associated with his or her incarceration in a county or city jail; and to make nonsubstantive, technical revisions to update the existing code language to current style.

Impact

This legislation, upon enactment, will revise Section 14-6-22 of the Alabama Code, impacting how financial responsibilities are assigned in misdemeanor cases. The courts will have more flexibility to determine costs based on actual expenditures, and these will be considered as additional costs of court on top of any other legal financial obligations incurred by the defendant. This could lead to increased financial repercussions for those convicted, particularly for lower-income individuals who may struggle to pay these costs.

Summary

House Bill 281 seeks to amend existing regulations regarding the financial obligations of individuals convicted of misdemeanors in Alabama. Specifically, the bill mandates that courts require convicted defendants to pay for their housing, maintenance, and medical costs incurred during their incarceration in county or city jails. This payment requirement is intended to replace the previous fixed cap of $20 per day, allowing courts to charge actual incurred expenses, which could potentially place a substantial financial burden on defendants fined under this provision.

Contention

There has been concern regarding the potential for this bill to exacerbate issues of economic inequality within the legal system. Critics argue that requiring full reimbursement for incarceration can disproportionately affect individuals with limited financial resources, leading to further complications such as debt or inability to pay fines. Proponents may argue that it is only fair for convicted individuals to bear the costs of their incarceration, but the essential balance between accountability and equitable treatment under law remains a significant point of debate.