Relating to electronic vote counting systems; to amend Section 17-7-21, Code of Alabama 1975, to prohibit the use of electronic vote counting systems that are capable of connection to the Internet or cell phone networks or that possess modem technology.
If passed, this bill would significantly impact the regulations surrounding election systems within Alabama. It mandates that all electronic vote counting systems must be incapable of connecting to the Internet or utilizing any modem technology. This change would enforce stricter controls over how votes are counted and would aim to restore public trust in the electoral process by mitigating fears regarding external tampering or hacking of voting systems. Local governing bodies would need to adapt to these new stipulations and potentially invest in updated equipment that complies with the legislation.
House Bill 54 aims to amend Section 17-7-21 of the Code of Alabama 1975 to prohibit the use of electronic vote counting systems that can connect to the Internet, cell phone networks, or that possess modem technology. The bill is introduced with the intent to enhance the security of vote counting methods used in elections across Alabama. By disallowing these technologies, the bill seeks to minimize potential vulnerabilities that could lead to election interference or manipulation via online threats.
The conversation surrounding HB54 reflects notable division among legislators and stakeholders. Supporters of the bill argue that electronic systems connected to the Internet pose extreme security risks, potentially undermining the integrity of elections. They believe that by using entirely offline voting systems, the bill would facilitate a more transparent voting process. Conversely, critics of the bill worry about the practicality of enforcing such limitations. They argue that the complexity and cost of transitioning to completely offline systems could hinder efficient voting and counting processes, particularly in a rapidly digital world. They also express concerns regarding the implications of restricting technological advancements in voting systems.