Relating to motor vehicles and traffic; to amend Sections 11-49-4, 32-5A-173, and 32-5A-176, Code of Alabama 1975; to prohibit a municipality from setting speed limits on county-maintained streets within its corporate limits; and to make nonsubstantive, technical revisions to update the existing code language to current style.
Impact
The implications of HB86 could be significant for local municipalities. By removing their ability to regulate speed limits on county-maintained roads, municipalities may lose a degree of control over traffic regulation, which could lead to frustrations among local leaders who believe they understand their communities' safety needs better. This may result in a one-size-fits-all approach to traffic safety that does not consider unique local conditions or concerns.
Summary
House Bill 86 seeks to amend existing traffic laws in Alabama concerning the responsibilities of municipalities regarding speed limits. It specifically prohibits municipalities from setting speed limits on streets that are maintained by the county but fall within the municipal boundaries. Under existing code, local authorities have the power to establish speed limits; however, this bill aims to restrict that authority on specific types of roadways, effectively transferring enforcement power to county regulations for these streets. The intent behind this bill is likely to create consistency in traffic regulations across different jurisdictions within the state.
Contention
Notably, the bill has generated discussion regarding the balance of power between state and local governments. Supporters may argue that county control of maintenance provides efficiencies in regulation and uniformity; however, opponents may raise concerns about the diminishing capacity for local governance on issues that directly affect community safety and livability. Additionally, the bill incorporates technical amendments that update the code's language, which are straightforward, but the underlying issue of local control could remain contentious among different stakeholders.
Relating to self-defense, to amend Section 13A-3-23, Code of Alabama 1975, to provide a person's use of physical force in defending himself, herself, or another person is presumed reasonable; to further provide for the immunity received by a person whose use of physical force on another person is justified self-defense; to shift the burden of proving a person's use of physical force is not justified to the state; and to make nonsubstantive, technical revisions to update the existing code language to current style
Mobile County; to remove any real property owned by the University of Mobile in the corporate limits of any municipality from the corporate limits of the municipality, Constitutional Amendment
Mobile County; to remove any real property owned by the University of Mobile in the corporate limits of any municipality from the corporate limits of the municipality, Constitutional Amendment
Mobile County; to remove any real property owned by the University of Mobile in the corporate limits of any municipality from the corporate limits of the municipality, constitutional amendment
Mobile County; to remove any real property owned by the University of Mobile in the corporate limits of any municipality from the corporate limits of the municipality, constitutional amendment
Alabama Business and Nonprofit Entities Code; amended to delete references to Alabama Nonprofit Corporation Law, clarify and streamline certain provisions in accordance with changes in Delaware law and the Model Business Corporation Act