Alabama House Bill HB87

Alabama 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/7/23
• Refer: 3/7/23
• Report Pass: 4/5/23
• Engrossed: 4/27/23
• Refer: 4/27/23
• Report Pass: 5/24/23
• Enrolled: 6/1/23
• Passed: 6/1/23

Caption

Relating to public officers and employees; to amend Section 36-21-7, Code of Alabama 1975, to increase the time period during which the state or a political subdivision of the state must be reimbursed for the training of a new law enforcement officer, certified corrections officer, fire protection personnel, or firefighter; to include custom fitted uniform items in the required reimbursement; and to make nonsubstantive, technical revisions to update the existing code language to current style.

Impact

The impact of HB87 is primarily on the financial responsibilities of various state entities regarding the training of public safety personnel. The extension of the reimbursement period provides agencies with greater support and ensures they are not left with financial burdens when personnel leave shortly after their training. This change is expected to encourage local governments and public agencies to continue investing in quality training programs without the fear of losing funds if they do not retain the trained individuals for long.

Summary

House Bill 87 addresses the reimbursement obligations of state or political subdivisions concerning the training costs incurred for law enforcement officers, certified corrections officers, fire protection personnel, and firefighters. This legislation amends Section 36-21-7 of the Code of Alabama 1975, extending the reimbursement period from 24 to 36 months and including custom-fitted uniform items in the reimbursement requirements. The bill aims to ensure that agencies which invest in training qualified personnel are compensated if those employees move to different agencies after their training period.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB87 appears to be generally positive, particularly among proponents of enhanced public safety funding. Supporters argue that ensuring the reimbursement for additional costs, including uniforms and training expenses, demonstrates a commitment to public safety and the personnel dedicated to it. However, there may be concerns regarding the implications of extended reimbursement timelines on budgeting and financial planning for these agencies.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from the definition of 'custom-fitted uniform items' and how broadly this term is interpreted. Agencies might have differing opinions on what constitutes reasonable expenses for uniforms and whether this will lead to increased costs or potential abuse of reimbursement claims. Additionally, while the bill has generally received support, it might face scrutiny concerning its fiscal implications on state budgets if numerous personnel switch agencies frequently within the mandated time frame.