Relating to consent to medical treatment; to amend Sections 22-8-4 and 22-8-6, Code of Alabama 1975; to provide that a minor who is married or divorced may consent to certain medical treatment; and to provide that a pregnant minor may not consent to certain pregnancy-related treatment.
Impact
If enacted, SB226 will amend Sections 22-8-4 and 22-8-6 of the Code of Alabama, which dictate the conditions under which minors can consent to medical services. The expansion includes granting consent authority to minors based on their marital status—specifically, recognizing those who are divorced or married—and delineating that pregnant minors are not permitted to consent to pregnancy-related medical treatment. This change reflects an impactful shift in the medical and legal approach to minors' involvement in their healthcare decisions, potentially reducing cases of parental involvement disputes in medical contexts.
Summary
Senate Bill 226 (SB226) introduces modifications to existing laws regarding the consent of minors to medical treatment in Alabama. The bill allows minors who are at least 14 years old, high school graduates, married, or divorced to give their own consent for medical treatment without the need for a parent's approval. This effectively expands the healthcare rights of certain minors, aligning with contemporary perspectives on autonomy and responsibility at younger ages. Notably, the bill stipulates that pregnant minors cannot consent to treatment related to their pregnancy, which represents a significant point of discussion.
Contention
The bill raises significant concerns about the implications for vulnerable populations. Opponents might argue that allowing minors to consent to medical treatment without parental involvement could lead to inadequate oversight and the potential for minors making decisions that affect their health without the necessary guidance. On the other hand, supporters may posit that it empowers minors, particularly those from unstable or abusive family environments, to seek necessary medical care independently. The prohibition on pregnant minors consenting to their own pregnancy treatment could also draw critiques, as it places restrictions on their autonomy and ability to make choices that directly affect their health and wellbeing.
Off-label medical treatment; adverse action by occupational licensing board because of recommendation, prohibited; patient informed consent, required; cause of action, provided
Adoption, Minor Adoption Code and Adult Adoption Code revised, procedures related to investigations, service of notice, and revocation of consent further provided for, duties of Department of Human Resources further provided for
Adoption, Minor Adoption Code and Adult Adoption Code revised, procedures related to investigations, service of notice, and revocation of consent further provided for, duties of Department of Human Resources further provided for