Alabama Senate Bill SJR12

Alabama 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/21/23
• Refer: 3/21/23
• Report Pass: 4/4/23
• Report Pass: 4/20/23
• Engrossed: 4/20/23
• Refer: 4/20/23
• Report Pass: 5/23/23
• Enrolled: 5/23/23
• Passed: 5/23/23

Caption

DESIGNATING THE BRIDGE ON MCFARLAND BOULEVARD THAT SPANS INTERSTATE 20 AND INTERSTATE 59 AS THE LUTHER STANCEL PATE III MEMORIAL BRIDGE.

Impact

The passing of SJR12 will result in the formal naming of a prominent local infrastructure feature, which could have implications for community identity and pride. This resolution would likely lead to signage and other forms of recognition that highlight the bridge and its namesake. Memorial designations such as this can foster community support and may encourage residents to engage more with local history and heritage.

Summary

SJR12 is a resolution that designates the bridge on McFarland Boulevard that spans Interstate 20 and Interstate 59 as the Luther Stancel Pate III Memorial Bridge. The resolution serves to honor the memory of Luther Stancel Pate III, recognizing his contributions and significance to the community. This type of memorial designation is often utilized by state legislatures to commemorate individuals who have made notable impacts in various fields or within their localities, often promoting a sense of local pride and remembrance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR12 appears to be positive, largely stemming from communal support for memorializing local figures. The act of naming infrastructure in honor of individuals is generally well-received as it reflects respect and acknowledgment for contributions made to society. Community members and local officials might express pride in the act, viewing it as a recognition of shared values and history.

Contention

While SJR12 focuses on a non-controversial topic of commemorating an individual, potential points of contention could arise if the resolution elicits significant public interest or discussion regarding other issues of commemoration in the community. In the context of naming infrastructure after individuals, debates could surface surrounding who is honored and the criteria for such designations, ensuring that all community voices are represented.