Alabama Senate Bill SJR77

Alabama 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/17/23
• Refer: 5/17/23
• Report Pass: 5/23/23
• Engrossed: 5/23/23
• Refer: 5/23/23
• Report Pass: 5/25/23
• Enrolled: 5/26/23
• Passed: 5/26/23

Caption

NAMING THE SENATOR TRIP PITTMAN INTERCHANGE IN BALDWIN COUNTY.

Impact

The resolution encourages the Alabama Department of Transportation to coordinate with local officials to facilitate the naming of the interchange. This act not only serves as a symbolic gesture of appreciation but also enhances the local heritage by solidifying the legacy of a prominent figure in the state's political landscape. By naming the interchange after Senator Pittman, the resolution aims to embed his contributions into the geographical identity of Baldwin County.

Summary

SJR77 is a resolution aimed at officially recognizing and naming the interchange at State Road 181 and Interstate 10 in Baldwin County as the Senator Trip Pittman Interchange. Senator Pittman served Alabama Senate District 32, which includes Baldwin County, demonstrating significant service to the area during his tenure from 2007 to 2018. This designation serves to honor his contributions and leadership, particularly considering his efforts in the state legislature and various community roles.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR77 is largely positive, reflecting a culture of respect and recognition for public service. The bill showcases an environment of appreciation for local leaders who have had considerable influence on community development and transportation projects. Legislators and community members likely view this resolution as a way to keep the legacies of dedicated public servants alive in the memory of current and future residents.

Contention

While discussions surrounding the resolution do not appear to have sparked significant contention, some may argue about the prioritization of such honorific acts, particularly in the context of larger transportation issues facing the state. However, any major points of contention are not explicitly noted in the provided discussions, indicating a general consensus on this matter.