Alabama 2024 Regular Session

Alabama House Bill HB235

Introduced
2/27/24  
Introduced
2/27/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Refer
2/27/24  
Engrossed
4/11/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Refer
4/16/24  
Engrossed
4/11/24  
Report Pass
4/23/24  
Refer
4/16/24  
Enrolled
5/8/24  
Report Pass
4/23/24  
Passed
5/16/24  
Enrolled
5/8/24  
Passed
5/16/24  

Caption

Scope of practice of architecture and duties of board

Impact

The bill's provisions call for amendments to several sections, clarifying the role and responsibilities of the Board. It enforces stricter guidelines on registration, including criminal background checks and education requirements consistent with nationally recognized standards. HB235 also reinstates a 'sunset provision,' which requires regular review of the Board's operations and effectiveness. This is aimed at ensuring accountability and responsiveness to changing needs in architectural practice and regulation.

Summary

House Bill 235 aims to update the Code of Alabama 1975 pertaining to architecture by amending existing sections and introducing new provisions. The bill focuses on the registration process for architects, detailing the duties of the Alabama Board for Registration of Architects and setting regulatory frameworks for entities practicing architecture. Notably, it outlines the implications for both individual architects and architectural entities, emphasizing the importance of maintaining professional standards within the industry.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB235 appears to be supportive among professional groups within the architectural community. Advocates express that the bill will enhance the regulatory framework that governs architectural practice, thereby bolstering public trust in licensed architects. However, there are concerns from individuals who fear that overly stringent requirements could deter potential new entrants into the profession, thus impacting the diversification and competitiveness of the field.

Contention

One notable point of contention is the balance between maintaining high professional standards and ensuring accessibility for aspiring architects. Critics argue that certain provisions may impose an undue burden on new registrants, particularly with heightened fees and detailed examination criteria. Conversely, proponents suggest such measures are necessary to protect public welfare by ensuring that only qualified individuals enter the profession.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A552

Requires architects disclose insurance coverage.

NJ S778

Requires architects disclose insurance coverage.

NJ S1302

Requires architects disclose insurance coverage.

DC PR25-1006

Board of Architecture, Interior Design, and Landscape Architecture Maurice Walters Confirmation Resolution of 2024

DC PR25-0656

Historic Preservation Review Board Georgeanne Matthews Confirmation Resolution of 2024

AK SB126

Architect/engineer Registration Board

DC PR25-0660

Historic Preservation Review Board Patrick Williams Confirmation Resolution of 2024

DC PR25-1007

Board of Architecture, Interior Design, and Landscape Architecture Robert Alter Confirmation Resolution of 2024