Alabama 2024 Regular Session

Alabama House Bill HB366

Introduced
3/21/24  
Introduced
3/21/24  

Caption

Consumer protection, further provides for data breaches

Impact

If enacted, HB 366 would introduce criminal penalties for entities that do not secure sensitive data adequately, marking a significant change in how data breaches are handled under state law. Covered entities would include a broad range of organizations such as corporations, nonprofits, and government entities. This responsibility aims to ensure that entities take proactive steps to safeguard sensitive information, thus potentially leading to an increase in operational costs tied to compliance requirements.

Summary

House Bill 366 aims to amend the Alabama Data Breach Notification Act of 2018, focusing on enhancing protections regarding sensitive personally identifying information. The bill defines additional terms related to data breaches and stipulates that a covered entity commits an unlawful trade practice if a data breach occurs and reasonable security measures were not in place. The goal is to enforce stricter compliance with data security expectations among entities that handle sensitive information, including personal and location data.

Contention

Discussions surrounding HB 366 are expected to revolve around the balance between enhanced consumer protections and the technological burdens placed on businesses. Proponents argue that the bill is crucial for consumer safety in an increasingly digital world, while opponents might express concerns regarding the administrative and financial burden that would result from strict compliance with new security measures. Furthermore, there might be debate over how 'reasonable security measures' are defined and enforced, potentially leading to disparate interpretations among different entities.

Additional_notes

The bill provides that its implementation does not require a 2/3 vote of local governmental entities, as it falls within certain exceptions outlined in the state constitution. This provision could lead to discussions about local autonomy versus state-wide regulatory mandates, highlighting the ongoing tension between state regulations and local governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

ME LD610

An Act to Expand the 1998 Special Retirement Plan to Include Employees Who Work for the Office of Chief Medical Examiner

ME LD794

An Act to Include Judicial Marshals in the 1998 Special Plan for Retirement

ME LD137

An Act to Expand the 1998 Special Retirement Plan to Include Employees Who Work for the Office of Chief Medical Examiner

ME LD579

An Act to Include Certain Mental Health Workers Under the 1998 Special Plan for Retirement

ME LD1760

An Act to Include Certain Crisis Outreach and Crisis Services Workers Under the 1998 Special Plan for Retirement

ME LD1761

An Act to Include Certain Mental Health Workers Under the 1998 Special Plan for Retirement

CA AB3066

Workers’ compensation: privacy.

CA SB622

Cannabis regulation: plant identification program: unique identifier.