Alabama 2024 Regular Session

Alabama House Bill HB96

Introduced
2/6/24  
Introduced
2/6/24  
Report Pass
2/28/24  
Refer
2/6/24  
Refer
2/29/24  
Report Pass
2/28/24  
Report Pass
4/30/24  
Refer
2/29/24  
Enrolled
5/8/24  
Report Pass
4/30/24  
Passed
5/17/24  
Enrolled
5/8/24  
Passed
5/17/24  

Caption

City of Lake View, to authorize municipal court to recall bench warrant for fee

Impact

The implementation of HB 96 will specifically modify the operations of the municipal court in Lake View by introducing a fee for warrant recalls, which will not exceed $100. This change is expected to relieve some pressure on the municipal court system by allowing defendants a more straightforward means to manage outstanding warrants, thereby potentially decreasing the volume of unpaid fines and improving compliance with local ordinances. The collected fees are to be allocated to the City of Lake View Corrections Fund, ensuring that the funds directly support local judicial functions.

Summary

House Bill 96 focuses on the municipal court system in the City of Lake View, Tuscaloosa County, Alabama. The bill grants municipal judges or magistrates the authority to recall failure to appear or compliance warrants in exchange for a fee set by the defendant. This initiative aims to provide a structured process for defendants to clear warrants while generating funds for the city's courts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 96 appears to be generally positive, particularly from supporters who view it as a practical solution to manage warrant recalls. The introduction of a fee is seen as a way to incentivize compliance with municipal ordinances while simultaneously providing a new revenue stream for the municipal court. Opposition, if any, may stem from concerns about the financial burden the fee places on low-income defendants, but no significant dissent is noted in the voting history.

Contention

A notable point of contention regarding HB 96 is the degree of discretion afforded to municipal judges or magistrates in recalling warrants. Critics may argue that the subjective nature of this discretion could lead to inconsistencies in how defendants are treated based on the judges' personal views. However, the bill clearly states that recalling a warrant is at the sole discretion of the municipal judicial authority, emphasizing the need for a reasonable application of any financial requirements imposed on defendants.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.