State agencies; settlement agreements for claims against the state restricted when funds not available
Impact
If implemented, SB319 will significantly alter the protocol for how state agencies handle settlement agreements. Agencies will be required to assess their financial capacity before entering a settlement, thus potentially reducing the number of settlements and impacting how claims against state agencies are resolved. This could lead to longer resolution times for claims and might discourage some claims from being pursued if agencies find themselves constrained by financial limitations.
Summary
SB319 is a legislative initiative designed to regulate the actions of state agencies concerning settlement agreements for claims made against them. The bill stipulates that no state agency can execute a settlement unless it has sufficient funds available to cover the total amount of the settlement. This measure is aimed at ensuring states do not enter into financial commitments that they cannot fulfill, thereby safeguarding taxpayer resources and enhancing fiscal responsibility within the state's budget management process.
Contention
While proponents of SB319 argue that it is a necessary step toward increasing transparency and accountability in state financial dealings, critics may view it as an impediment to quick resolutions of claims. There may be concerns that the requirement for sufficient funds could delay settlements significantly, potentially leaving claimants, often individuals or entities in need, without timely access to justice. Additionally, the bill mandates that if sufficient funds aren’t available, the agency must notify several public officials at least 90 days prior, which could add layers of bureaucracy to settlement procedures that might frustrate both agencies and claimants alike.
Bars nondisclosure agreements to settle sexual assault and harassment claims against certain State officers and employees and members of Legislature; bars use of campaign funds to settle claims.
In corporate net income tax, further providing for definitions; in procedure and administration, further providing for petition for reassessment and for review by board and providing for settlement conference process, for closing agreements and for report to General Assembly; and, in general provisions, further providing for timely filing.
In corporate net income tax, further providing for definitions; in procedure and administration, further providing for petition for reassessment and for review by board and providing for settlement conference process, for closing agreements and for report to General Assembly; and, in general provisions, further providing for timely filing.