Alabama House Bill HB63

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/7/24
• Introduced: 2/4/25
• Refer: 11/7/24
• Refer: 2/4/25

Caption

Acknowledgement of paternity; certain rebuttable presumptions relating to the best interest of a child, created

Impact

If passed, this legislation is expected to significantly impact family law in Alabama, particularly in how child custody matters are determined. By establishing presumption of shared parenting and requiring consent for relocation, the bill aims to promote a more balanced approach to parental rights and responsibilities. It reinforces the notion that both parents should be actively involved in their children's upbringing, although it may also introduce complexities in situations where one parent might resist such involvement. The provisions are designed to align with the best interests of the child while encouraging more cooperative co-parenting relationships.

Summary

House Bill 63, also known as The Good Dad Act, aims to amend Section 26-17-305 of the Code of Alabama to create certain rebuttable presumptions regarding child custody and support related to legally acknowledged fathers. The bill asserts that a valid acknowledgment of paternity not only confers all rights and duties of a parent to the acknowledged father but also introduces presumptions in favor of joint custody and shared parenting time in any related legal proceedings. One of the notable provisions specifies that a parent may not relocate a child out of the state without the express consent of the other parent or permission from the court, thereby ensuring both parents are involved in major decisions affecting their children's lives.

Contention

Some concerns may arise around the potential ramifications of these presumptions, especially regarding instances of domestic violence. While the bill does include exceptions for cases involving domestic or family violence, the criteria under which these exceptions can be applied may be points of contention. Critics might argue that, despite the exceptions, the bill could still pose risks to the safety of victims by mandating shared custody presumption. Furthermore, discussions may arise on how effectively existing laws regarding domestic violence are integrated into this framework, ensuring that vulnerable parents and children are adequately protected while still promoting the rights of acknowledged fathers.