Arkansas Senate Bill SB98

Arkansas 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/16/22
• Refer: 2/16/22
• Report Pass: 2/22/22
• Engrossed: 2/23/22
• Enrolled: 3/3/22
• Chaptered: 3/8/22
• Passed: 3/8/22

Caption

An Act For The University Of Arkansas - System And Various Divisions Supplemental Appropriation.

Impact

The bill's impact on state laws is largely financial, as it proposes to augment the existing budget specifically for educational purposes. By supplementing funds originally appropriated in Act 334 of 2021, SB98 significantly contributes to the operational sustainability of the University of Arkansas and its associated programs. Furthermore, the funding aims to expand the jurisdiction of the Criminal Justice Institute to better equip law enforcement and community organizations in combating illicit drugs, thereby addressing a pressing public safety issue in Arkansas.

Summary

Senate Bill 98 is a supplemental appropriation act aimed at providing additional funds for capital improvements at the University of Arkansas and for illicit drug education and training facilitated by its Criminal Justice Institute. The bill allocates approximately $1,920,011 for capital improvements and $17,758 for educational and training programs that address illicit drug activities within the state. It indicates a prioritization of both infrastructure development at educational institutions and the enhancement of community safety through targeted training programs.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment towards SB98 appears to be supportive among lawmakers, reflecting a consensus on the importance of addressing drug-related challenges and improving educational facilities. The bill received significant legislative backing, evidenced by a strong vote tally with 92 yeas against only 4 nays during its third reading. This indicates a favorable perception among the majority of legislators regarding the necessity of such expenditures for public welfare and institutional improvement.

Contention

While there are no reported significant points of contention regarding SB98, its implications on the distribution of state funds and prioritization of educational initiatives could spark debates in broader budgetary contexts. Some legislators might argue for alternative funding allocations or raise concerns over the efficiency of the proposed educational programs. However, as the bill has progressed through the legislative process with substantial support, it seems that any disagreements have not significantly impeded its passage.