Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

Arkansas House Bill HB1067

Introduced
1/4/23  
Refer
1/9/23  
Report Pass
3/29/23  
Engrossed
3/30/23  
Refer
3/31/23  
Report Pass
4/4/23  
Enrolled
4/5/23  
Chaptered
4/10/23  

Caption

To Modify The Law Concerning Residency Requirements For Certain Firefighters.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1067 will directly influence the hiring practices within municipal fire departments and fire protection districts, potentially widening the pool of applicants for firefighter positions. By allowing some districts to establish residency requirements only under certain conditions, the bill encourages the recruitment of qualified individuals from neighboring areas, which could improve the overall effectiveness of fire services in less populated regions. This change could also help mitigate staffing shortages that fire departments often experience, particularly in rural areas.

Summary

House Bill 1067, which modifies the law concerning residency requirements for firefighters in Arkansas, aims to provide more flexibility in hiring practices for municipalities and fire protection districts. The bill stipulates that a residency requirement may only be enacted if certain conditions are met, specifically when a department uses a mix of full-time paid firefighters, volunteers, or part-time paid personnel. This legislation sought to address the hiring challenges that fire departments face, particularly in rural areas where qualified candidates might not reside within city limits.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 1067 appears to be generally favorable among legislators, given its unanimous approval with 32 votes in favor and none against during its third reading. This suggests that the bill is viewed positively as a necessary adjustment to accommodate operational needs and improve public safety. However, there may be underlying concerns regarding how these changes affect local governance and the employment stability of current firefighters under new residency rules.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, there may be points of contention surrounding the implementation of residency requirements. Critics may argue that any restrictions on local hiring could diminish community engagement in public safety jobs, particularly if local residents feel they are being overlooked in favor of candidates from other areas. Additionally, there might be discussions about the balance between ensuring adequate public safety and maintaining local employment opportunities for residents who wish to serve their community as firefighters.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2089

Volunteer firefighters: background checks.

CA AB2727

Personal income taxes: credit: firefighters.

AL HB227

Firefighters; to limit the post-retirement qualifying period for benefits for certain occupational diseases

CA AB932

Workers’ compensation: off-duty firefighters.

CA AB1283

Mutual aid: reimbursements: volunteer firefighters.

TX HB2054

Relating to the conditions of employment for firefighters employed by certain districts and entities; providing penalties.

NJ S3567

Provides access to periodic cancer screening examinations for volunteer firefighters through SHBP physicians and other providers.

NJ A4649

Provides access to periodic cancer screening examinations for volunteer firefighters through SHBP physicians and other providers.