Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

Arkansas House Bill HB1641

Introduced
3/15/23  
Refer
3/15/23  
Report Pass
3/29/23  
Engrossed
3/30/23  
Refer
3/31/23  
Report Pass
4/4/23  
Enrolled
4/5/23  
Chaptered
4/10/23  

Caption

To Amend The Law Governing Payments In Lieu Of Ad Valorem Taxes; And To Provide For The Billing And Collection Of Certain Payments Related To Certain Leased Or Purchased Property.

Impact

The passage of HB 1641 will significantly affect the handling of tax payments for properties leased or purchased under specific agreements. By mandating that lessees provide information related to their agreements to the county assessor, the law seeks to enhance transparency and ensure proper assessment for tax purposes. Additionally, the bill outlines how payments in lieu of taxes should be billed and subsequently disbursed by county collectors, aligning this process more closely with traditional ad valorem tax collection practices.

Summary

House Bill 1641 aims to amend the law governing payments in lieu of ad valorem taxes and establishes new procedures for the billing and collection of these payments in relation to certain leased or purchased properties. The bill stipulates that any agreement entered into on or after September 1, 2023, must include a provision that requires the lessee or purchaser to submit a copy of the agreement to the county assessor. This includes a description of all relevant real and personal property involved in the agreement, creating a clearer framework for tax obligations related to properties not subject to standard tax assessments.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1641 appears to be generally positive, particularly among those advocating for improved clarity and efficiency in tax processes related to property leasing and purchasing. Supporters believe that the bill will streamline tax collection and reduce misunderstandings surrounding tax obligations. However, there may be some concerns among property owners about the increased administrative responsibilities that come with the new requirements, though specific opposing sentiments were not detailed in the discussions.

Contention

While HB 1641 does not seem to have major points of contention based on the voting history, it could face scrutiny from stakeholders who are concerned about privacy and the disclosure of proprietary information, as the bill allows for exceptions in cases of trade secrets. The balance between transparency in tax collection and protecting sensitive business information might lead to discussions as the implementation of the bill progresses. Overall, the focus is notably on updates to tax procedural law rather than on broad policy shifts.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.