Arkansas Senate Bill SB26

Arkansas 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/2/24
• Refer: 4/10/24
• Report Pass: 4/17/24
• Engrossed: 4/18/24
• Enrolled: 4/24/24
• Chaptered: 4/30/24
• Passed: 4/30/24

Caption

An Act To Make An Appropriation For The Payment Of Approved Claims.

Impact

Once enacted, SB26 will have immediate implications for the state budget, as it plans to allocate funds that are deemed necessary for settling claims approved by the State Claims Commission. This legislation would ensure that the state can pay its debts in a timely manner, particularly claims that relate to health services, welfare, and other forms of state assistance. Such appropriations are essential for maintaining financial accountability and preserving the state's creditworthiness by affirming that it meets its legal financial obligations.

Summary

Senate Bill 26 aims to provide appropriations that are supplemental to existing appropriations for the fiscal year 2023-2024, specifically directed at fulfilling approved claims against the State of Arkansas. The bill outlines various allocations to multiple state departments and agencies, including significant amounts designated for the Department of Human Services and the Department of Finance and Administration. The total appropriated amount specified in the bill is approximately $3 million for various claims, indicating a commitment to addressing outstanding obligations of the state to different entities and individuals.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB26 appears to be supportive, especially among legislators who view it as a necessary step to ensure that the state meets its financial commitments. There does not appear to be significant opposition or contention noted in the discussions regarding this bill. However, the rapid approval of funds suggests a degree of urgency that might reflect underlying financial pressures tied to welfare services or state health programs.

Contention

Despite the bill's supportive framing, the circumstances behind the claims being addressed could lead to broader discussions about the funding adequacies for state services. The emergency clause within the bill, which necessitates immediate action to prevent harm to the state's reputation, may elicit scrutiny regarding the management of state funds and the processes that have resulted in these claims. Moreover, the special language included specifies the manner of fund disbursement, which could raise questions among lawmakers about long-term fiscal responsibility and the state's approach to service funding.