Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

Arkansas House Bill HB1045

Introduced
11/21/24  
Refer
1/13/25  

Caption

To Place Certain Requirements On An Individual Planning A Crop Residue Burn; And To Address Liability Of An Individual Who Has Followed Crop Residue Burn Requirements.

Impact

The legislation's impact includes redefining liability concerning crop residue burns. Under HB1045, individuals conducting burns in accordance with the specified requirements are granted a degree of legal protection, as they cannot be held liable for damages arising from their burns unless proven negligent. This provision aims to encourage farmers to adhere to burning regulations without the fear of litigation, thereby fostering a safer agricultural practice.

Summary

House Bill 1045 is designed to regulate the practices surrounding crop residue burning in Arkansas. The bill mandates that individuals planning to undertake a crop residue burn must report their intention to the Department of Agriculture for prior approval. Furthermore, it requires compliance with the Arkansas Voluntary Smoke Management Guidelines for Row Crop Burning, aimed at reducing smoke pollution and related environmental impacts. This regulatory framework emphasizes the need for an organized approach to burning practices to safeguard public health and the environment.

Conclusion

Overall, HB1045 presents a comprehensive approach to managing crop residue burning, balancing regulatory requirements with liability protections for compliant individuals. As discussions and potential amendments continue, stakeholders in the agricultural community will closely monitor the effects of this bill on their practices and the implications of its enforcement.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from the civil penalties established in the bill. The legislation stipulates significant fines for individuals who conduct burns without proper approval or fail to comply with the guidelines. The penalties start at $25,000 for first-time violations, escalating to $75,000 for subsequent offenses. Critics may argue that such high penalties could be excessively burdensome for farmers, potentially discouraging them from utilizing prescribed burning practices that can be beneficial for land management and crop yield.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.