Arkansas House Bill HB1086

Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/25
• Refer: 1/13/25
• Report Pass: 4/8/25
• Engrossed: 4/9/25
• Enrolled: 4/11/25

Caption

An Act For The Arkansas Court Of Appeals Appropriation For The 2025-2026 Fiscal Year.

Impact

The enactment of HB 1086 allows for continued financial support of the Arkansas Court of Appeals, enabling it to retain staff and cover operational expenses. By providing specific funding directives, the bill ensures the court can fulfill its judicial responsibilities without interruption. It highlights the state's commitment to maintaining the efficiency and effectiveness of the judicial system, which is crucial for upholding the rule of law and delivering justice in the state.

Summary

House Bill 1086 is designed to provide appropriations for the Arkansas Court of Appeals for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026. This bill sets forth the financial framework necessary to support the court's various operational needs, including the salaries of court personnel and other related expenses. The total appropriated amount amounts to approximately $6.58 million, which incorporates funds for regular salaries, operational expenses, and legal counsel among other financial allocations necessary for effective court functioning.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1086 appears to be largely positive, as it enjoys bipartisan support amongst legislators. The bill's necessity for maintaining judicial operations is recognized across party lines, emphasizing a shared interest in ensuring that the judicial system remains well-funded and capable of addressing the legal needs of Arkansans. The unanimous vote for its third reading also reflects this support.

Contention

While the bill is primarily focused on appropriations for the court, there may be underlying concerns regarding the allocation of these funds in light of broader budget constraints. Although not significantly contentious, discussions during the legislative process might touch upon fiscal responsibility and the need to balance court funding with other state priorities. Overall, the primary focus remains on ensuring adequate funding without significant opposition.