Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

Arkansas House Bill HB1142

Introduced
1/15/25  
Refer
1/15/25  
Report Pass
4/1/25  
Engrossed
4/2/25  
Refer
4/2/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Enrolled
4/14/25  

Caption

To Create The Reproductive Empowerment And Support Through Optimal Restoration (restore) Act.

Impact

The RESTORE Act mandates that Title X-funded facilities in Arkansas include restorative reproductive medicine as part of their services. This encompasses assisted reproductive technologies and other related healthcare services aimed at improving fertility. Moreover, insurance companies operating in Arkansas would be required to cover in vitro fertilization and other restorative reproductive services, thereby expanding access to necessary treatments. The law establishes a framework for the Department of Health to develop training programs for healthcare providers on the implementation of restorative reproductive practices, ensuring that care is informed and effective.

Summary

House Bill 1142, known as the Reproductive Empowerment and Support Through Optimal Restoration (RESTORE) Act, aims to address reproductive health issues by promoting restorative reproductive medicine. The bill recognizes the increasing interest among women to proactively monitor and understand their reproductive health and seeks to ensure that they have access to high-quality care. It highlights the importance of diagnosing and treating underlying conditions that contribute to infertility, a common issue affecting a significant percentage of couples. This initiative aspires to fill the gaps in research and treatment available for women's reproductive health conditions.

Contention

While proponents assert that this bill is a significant advancement for reproductive health, critics may question the efficacy of restorative reproductive methods compared to traditional assisted reproductive technologies. The discussions surrounding this bill reflect a broader debate on women's health rights and reproductive autonomy, particularly concerning access to comprehensive care. Key points of contention may arise regarding the implications for healthcare providers who are opposed to certain treatments on moral or religious grounds, potentially impacting the availability of services if the bill is enacted.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.